Re: spamd, CARP and relayd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 7:15 am

"Urban Hillebrand" writes:

> (3) I found several hints in the archives that some people believed to

Some variants of broken smtp configurations will choke on greylisting,
and spamd doesn't really have much in the way of smtp smarts beyond
what it needs in order to waste spammers' time. If somebody important
is unable to deal with greyliting, you will probably need to whitelist
them. And yes, those toy relay checkers that do not check if the
message gets delivered do tend to think spamd is an open relay. That
and some spammers' tricks will swell your greylist a bit from time to
time, but I don't really see that as much of a problem in real life.

- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
spamd, CARP and relayd, Urban Hillebrand, (Wed Jan 23, 8:02 am)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Thu Jan 24, 7:15 am)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, elpinguim, (Wed Jan 23, 1:56 pm)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, Urban Hillebrand, (Wed Jan 23, 6:28 pm)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, Renaud Allard, (Thu Jan 24, 10:19 am)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 7:29 pm)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, Richard Daemon, (Wed Jan 23, 4:05 pm)
Re: spamd, CARP and relayd, Urban Hillebrand, (Wed Jan 23, 6:33 pm)