Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » January » 24

Re: brute force voip QoS

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Daniel Ouellet
Subject: Re: brute force voip QoS
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 7:12 pm

Daniel Ouellet wrote:

Should have been UDP/5060 here. Not 5050 as above. Sorry, fat finger...

Or in some cases when NAT traversal is also in use for SIP, you will 
have UDP/5060 and UDP/5061.

Regardless these are and have to be from very limited source and should 
never be open to the world as well. The SBC controllers here as usually 
two. Some setup have a few more, but very limited in numbers and are not 
changing either.

Best,

Daniel
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
brute force voip QoS, Jeff Santos, (Wed Jan 23, 7:28 am)
Re: brute force voip QoS, David Newman, (Wed Jan 23, 4:53 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Chris Cappuccio, (Wed Jan 23, 5:08 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 5:21 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 5:39 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, David Newman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:00 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, David Newman, (Wed Jan 23, 6:04 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 6:54 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 7:12 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, scott, (Thu Jan 24, 1:21 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Soner Tari, (Fri Jan 25, 2:00 am)