login
Header Space

 
 

Re: brute force voip QoS

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Newman <dnewman@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 - 8:08 pm

Just use the 'tos' tag in pf.conf to match against the IP tos field.  

Most equipment sets this to something predictable, like 0x68 for RTP and
0xb8 for SIP....  Just use tcpdump to see what your RTP traffic is tagged
as, and also prioritize SIP above RTP.  You could also try matching based
on IP addresses if they are predictable, or a combination of the two.

Using just the tos tag by itself may lead to applications cheating to get
priority bandwidth.

David Newman [dnewman@networktest.com] wrote:

-- 
It is an old observation that the best writers sometimes disregard the rules of
rhetoric. When they do, however, the reader will usually find in the sentence
some compensating merit, attained at the cost of the violation. Unless he is
certain of doing as well, he will probably do best to follow the rules.
--William Strunk
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
brute force voip QoS, Jeff Santos, (Wed Jan 23, 10:28 am)
Re: brute force voip QoS, scott, (Thu Jan 24, 4:21 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, David Newman, (Wed Jan 23, 7:53 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Soner Tari, (Fri Jan 25, 5:00 am)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 8:21 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, David Newman, (Wed Jan 23, 9:04 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 9:54 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 10:12 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Chris Cappuccio, (Wed Jan 23, 8:08 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, David Newman, (Wed Jan 23, 9:00 pm)
Re: brute force voip QoS, Daniel Ouellet, (Wed Jan 23, 8:39 pm)
speck-geostationary