Hello misc@,
I have a question :
If I want the last packages/ports, I use a -current system, with
-current ports tree. Last updates of softwares are in -current. On the
other hand, they're developpement versions,If I want a *very* stable system (in production for example), I use
-release or -stable system. On the other hand, packages and ports are
not updated even it's necessary (for example, the last mozilla-firefox
is in 2.0.0.6 in ports tree -release and 2.0.0.10 in -current port tree).If I use openbsd, it's for security and stability. Or, I must do a
choice between :
* stability (-stable, -release) with no security updates of packages/ports,
* security (-current) with a less stability.Why does OpenBSD team not make a -stable branch of the port tree ? It's
necessary to security.
What method does recommend to have updated applications in -stable or
-release ?Thanks for your informations.
Nicolas
| Zach Brown | [PATCH 3 of 4] Teach paths to wake a specific void * target instead of a whole tas... |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
