Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Marco Peereboom <slash@...>
Cc: Unix Fan <unixfan@...>, <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:30 pm

Marco Peereboom writes:
> > -Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)
>
> Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.
>
> this discussion is very useful!

cwm (with the changes I've made :-) is looking nicer and nicer! I hope
to see these changes in the tree, soon.

// marc

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Wed Jan 2, 10:19 am)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Marco Peereboom, (Wed Jan 2, 1:59 pm)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Marco Peereboom, (Wed Jan 2, 10:47 am)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues? , Marco S Hyman, (Wed Jan 2, 4:30 pm)