Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » January » 2

Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?

Previous thread: A clue about php5, please? by STeve Andre' on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:20 am. (3 messages)

Next thread: gnash: can't load library by Chris on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:24 am. (3 messages)
[view original message]
From: Unix Fan <unixfan@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 2:46 am

Fluxbox is MIT licenced, it's dependencies are Imlib2, which is BSD licenced.. everything else is included in Xorg and is (AFAIK..) under a similar licence.


-Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)
[view original message]
From: Douglas A. Tutty <dtutty@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 10:19 am

I also forgot that Enlightenment seems to be under a suitable licence,

although probably too big to put in base.


Doug.
[view original message]
From: Marco Peereboom <slash@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:59 pm

Can we please stop this discussion?


Nothing is going to change in base X.  All the other things you guys are

so called "proposing" are in packages/ports.  Use them; that's why they

are there for.


Base is fine, leave it alone.
[view original message]
From: Marc Balmer <marc@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 2:13 pm

* Douglas A. Tutty wrote:


enlightnment is development code that does not run stable.  It is not


- Marc Balmer
[view original message]
From: Marco Peereboom <slash@...>
To: Unix Fan <unixfan@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 10:47 am

Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.


this discussion is very useful!
[view original message]
From: Marco S Hyman <marc@...>
To: Marco Peereboom <slash@...>
Cc: Unix Fan <unixfan@...>, <misc@...>
Subject: Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:30 pm

Marco Peereboom writes:

 > > -Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)

 >

 > Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.

 >

 > this discussion is very useful!


cwm (with the changes I've made :-) is looking nicer and nicer!   I hope

to see these changes in the tree, soon.


// marc
Previous thread: A clue about php5, please? by STeve Andre' on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:20 am. (3 messages)

Next thread: gnash: can't load library by Chris on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:24 am. (3 messages)