Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?

Previous thread: A clue about php5, please? by STeve Andre' on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:20 am. (3 messages)

Next thread: gnash: can't load library by Chris on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:24 am. (3 messages)
To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 2:46 am

Fluxbox is MIT licenced, it's dependencies are Imlib2, which is BSD licenced.. everything else is included in Xorg and is (AFAIK..) under a similar licence.

-Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)

To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 10:19 am

I also forgot that Enlightenment seems to be under a suitable licence,
although probably too big to put in base.

Doug.

To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:59 pm

Can we please stop this discussion?

Nothing is going to change in base X. All the other things you guys are
so called "proposing" are in packages/ports. Use them; that's why they
are there for.

Base is fine, leave it alone.

To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 2:13 pm

* Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

enlightnment is development code that does not run stable. It is not

- Marc Balmer

To: Unix Fan <unixfan@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 10:47 am

Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.

this discussion is very useful!

To: Marco Peereboom <slash@...>
Cc: Unix Fan <unixfan@...>, <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:30 pm

Marco Peereboom writes:
> > -Nix Fan. (Fvwm, IMHO is ugly..)
>
> Fluxbox is fugly, fvwm is awesome.
>
> this discussion is very useful!

cwm (with the changes I've made :-) is looking nicer and nicer! I hope
to see these changes in the tree, soon.

// marc

Previous thread: A clue about php5, please? by STeve Andre' on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 1:20 am. (3 messages)

Next thread: gnash: can't load library by Chris on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 4:24 am. (3 messages)