Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2008 - 12:29 am

On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:27:43PM +0000, Owain Ainsworth wrote:

To satisfy my own curiosity, looking at
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Free_X_window_managers which provides
links to 45 window managers for which there are wiki pages, I looked at
the licence for each and found that only xmonad, wmii, fluxbox, and
blackbox are licenced under BSD or MIT license.

Since I didn't look at the software itself, I don't know if any require
GPL libraries.

Just thought I'd FYI. I'm not making an argument either/any way.

Doug.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Edd Barrett, (Sun Dec 30, 9:05 pm)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Okan Demirmen, (Sun Dec 30, 10:53 pm)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Owain Ainsworth, (Tue Jan 1, 4:27 pm)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Wed Jan 2, 12:29 am)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Ted Unangst, (Sun Dec 30, 8:39 pm)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sun Dec 30, 3:41 pm)
Re: fvwm in base and repository with security issues?, Pau Amaro-Seoane, (Sun Dec 30, 4:47 pm)