On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:16:35PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
The 4 term licence in NetBSD is mostly dead too. It is not pushed as
desirable at all, it is up to the individual developer to use the
licence they feel appropriate and that seems, more often than not, to
be the 3 term licence.
Not that it matters much but I think the advertising clause is a waste
of time and does make life far more difficult for the people who do
want to comply with the licence conditions - they have to trawl
through all the code and pull out all the individuals that want their
names mentioned. It made a little more sense when the sources were
under the BSD umbrella but now it's just silly having to list a cast
of thousands in any advertising.
--
Brett Lymn
| Andreas Gruenbacher | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Alan Cox | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Jens Axboe | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
git: | |
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Alexey Dobriyan | [PATCH 09/33] netns ct: per-netns /proc/net/nf_conntrack, /proc/net/stat/nf_conntr... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
