Re: routing question

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: RW
Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 - 4:11 pm

On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:15:02 -0400, Paolo Supino wrote:


I'll bet you don't have some flows set up in ipsec.conf to handle it.
 Here is a simple ipsec.conf from one end of an ipsec tunnel where
OpenVPN clients also login:
ike esp from 10.10.8.0/24 to 172.22.3.0/24 peer 250.101.222.1
ike esp from 172.22.2.0/24 to 172.22.3.0/24 peer 250.101.222.1
ike esp from 195.228.107.202 to 172.22.3.0/24 peer 250.101.222.1
ike esp from 195.228.107.202 to 250.101.222.1

The first line adds the OpenVPN network to the mix.

Needless to say the other end of the tunnel has an ipsec.conf that
makes sure that traffic can return.

Fictional addresses used to protect the innocent...

Does that help?
Please reply to the list. I am subscribed and don't need a cc, thanks.

Rod/
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
routing question, Paolo Supino, (Mon Sep 3, 2:15 pm)
Re: routing question, David Newman, (Mon Sep 3, 2:42 pm)
Re: routing question, Stuart Henderson, (Mon Sep 3, 3:20 pm)
Re: routing question, Paolo Supino, (Mon Sep 3, 3:28 pm)
Re: routing question, David Newman, (Mon Sep 3, 3:35 pm)
Re: routing question, Paolo Supino, (Mon Sep 3, 3:53 pm)
Re: routing question, RW, (Mon Sep 3, 4:11 pm)
Re: routing question, Paolo Supino, (Mon Sep 3, 5:26 pm)
Re: routing question, RW, (Mon Sep 3, 6:36 pm)
Re: routing question (solved), Paolo Supino, (Mon Sep 3, 8:48 pm)