Re: SMTP flood + spamdb

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter N. M. Hansteen
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 - 1:46 am

Craig Skinner <craig.skinner@kepax.co.uk> writes:


If they adapt to greylisting and start following relevant RFCs, we've
succeeded in making spamming more expensive. I don't see that
happening much, though.  The spam that reaches content filtering here
has managed to get itself into the queue on real mail servers which
for some reason allows them.

On the 'spamd looks like an open relay' issue, it would make sense to
use a relay checker which actually checks for mail received, not just
the status codes.  On the other hand I actually like that part of
spamd the way it is.  Spammers who apparently think every IP address
in our range is an open relay occasionally swell our greylists quite a
bit.  None of it ever gets delivered, of course, but we see the
attempts quite often these days.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
SMTP flood + spamdb, patrick keshishian, (Sun Sep 23, 3:33 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Darrin Chandler, (Sun Sep 23, 5:39 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, patrick keshishian, (Sun Sep 23, 8:53 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Daniel Ouellet, (Sun Sep 23, 8:58 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Sun Sep 23, 10:34 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Stuart Henderson, (Mon Sep 24, 3:47 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, patrick keshishian, (Mon Sep 24, 8:01 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, patrick keshishian, (Tue Sep 25, 12:08 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue Sep 25, 12:38 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Tue Sep 25, 1:38 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue Sep 25, 1:50 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Sep 25, 2:29 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue Sep 25, 3:36 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Sep 25, 3:56 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, RW, (Tue Sep 25, 4:00 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Tue Sep 25, 4:14 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Tue Sep 25, 4:22 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Tue Sep 25, 4:30 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Tue Sep 25, 4:40 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Chris Smith, (Tue Sep 25, 7:51 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, RW, (Tue Sep 25, 4:04 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, RW, (Tue Sep 25, 4:17 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Tue Sep 25, 5:16 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, RW, (Tue Sep 25, 9:25 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Wed Sep 26, 12:50 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Wed Sep 26, 1:00 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed Sep 26, 1:46 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 4:18 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Damien Miller, (Wed Sep 26, 5:45 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 6:27 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Wed Sep 26, 6:41 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Jeremy C. Reed, (Wed Sep 26, 6:51 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 7:02 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Luca Corti, (Wed Sep 26, 7:22 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Wed Sep 26, 7:29 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 7:38 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 7:48 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed Sep 26, 7:54 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Craig Skinner, (Wed Sep 26, 8:01 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Dave Anderson, (Wed Sep 26, 8:03 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Stuart Henderson, (Wed Sep 26, 8:23 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed Sep 26, 8:26 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Luca Corti, (Wed Sep 26, 8:59 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Luca Corti, (Wed Sep 26, 9:06 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 10:05 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Bob Beck, (Wed Sep 26, 10:22 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Jeremy C. Reed, (Wed Sep 26, 10:48 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 11:13 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Liviu Daia, (Wed Sep 26, 11:16 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Rob, (Wed Sep 26, 2:03 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Hannah Schroeter, (Wed Sep 26, 2:33 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Rob, (Wed Sep 26, 2:51 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed Sep 26, 3:17 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, RW, (Wed Sep 26, 3:21 pm)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Eric Johnson, (Thu Sep 27, 2:45 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Juan Miscaro, (Thu Sep 27, 9:36 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Bob Beck, (Thu Sep 27, 10:50 am)
Re: SMTP flood + spamdb, Kurt Mosiejczuk, (Thu Sep 27, 11:04 am)