Unknown mailing list, 1.

Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Monday, September 24, 2007 - 4:13 pm

On 24.09-11:49, Can E. Acar wrote:
[ ... ]

that is not the case and is, in fact, the entire point of defining
policy. to define what the applications on the system can and
cannot do, irrespective of how "stupid" they (or their programmer),
or how malicious they (or their programmer) is / was.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Can E. Acar, (Mon Sep 24, 2:49 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Mon Sep 24, 4:52 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, , (Mon Sep 24, 4:13 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Luke Bakken, (Mon Sep 24, 5:28 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, , (Mon Sep 24, 8:40 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Darren Spruell, (Mon Sep 24, 4:48 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, , (Mon Sep 24, 8:34 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Tony Abernethy, (Mon Sep 24, 9:06 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux , Marco S Hyman, (Mon Sep 24, 11:26 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Todd Alan Smith, (Mon Sep 24, 9:32 pm)