login
Header Space

 
 

Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Monday, September 24, 2007 - 10:52 am

On 9/22/07, Douglas A. Tutty <dtutty@porchlight.ca> wrote:

A capsule summary of the situation is:

OpenBSD aims to improve security by taking advantage of easy-to-use,
hard-to-disable, low-overhead technologies.

yes, you can disable propolice if you need to, but you have to know how.
yes, you can disable random library mappings, but you have to know how.
yes, you can disable W^X, but you have to try.

you could turn off the security features, but why would you, since
they don't get in your way, and they don't slow you down all that
much. i've not seen SELinux installations (or similar technologies)
that are easy to use correctly...

-- 
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat Sep 22, 11:34 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Damien Miller, (Mon Sep 24, 11:09 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Chris Kuethe, (Mon Sep 24, 10:52 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Marco Peereboom, (Sat Sep 22, 11:27 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, L. V. Lammert, (Sat Sep 22, 7:47 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sun Sep 23, 5:54 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Ted Unangst, (Mon Sep 24, 1:29 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Mon Sep 24, 2:17 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Ted Unangst, (Mon Sep 24, 3:14 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Brian Candler, (Mon Sep 24, 11:31 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Mon Sep 24, 11:59 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Marc Espie, (Tue Sep 25, 6:06 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Marc Espie, (Tue Sep 25, 8:34 am)
Re: digitally signed distribution (was: OBSD's perspective o..., Martin Schröder, (Mon Sep 24, 11:18 am)
Re: digitally signed distribution (was: OBSD's perspective o..., Martin Schröder, (Mon Sep 24, 12:02 pm)
Re: digitally signed distribution (was: OBSD's perspective o..., Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, (Sun Sep 23, 6:38 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Ted Unangst, (Sat Sep 22, 2:50 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat Sep 22, 4:21 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, , (Sat Sep 22, 7:20 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Stuart Henderson, (Sat Sep 22, 4:00 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Joachim Schipper, (Sat Sep 22, 12:29 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Ihar Hrachyshka, (Sat Sep 22, 12:45 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Joachim Schipper, (Sat Sep 22, 4:39 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Darrin Chandler, (Sat Sep 22, 12:00 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Eduardo Tongson, (Sat Sep 22, 12:52 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Jason Dixon, (Sat Sep 22, 12:20 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat Sep 22, 1:21 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Ihar Hrachyshka, (Sat Sep 22, 1:38 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, David Gwynne, (Mon Sep 24, 10:08 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Jason Dixon, (Mon Sep 24, 10:25 am)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, , (Mon Sep 24, 2:28 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Brian Candler, (Sun Sep 23, 3:25 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Eduardo Tongson, (Sat Sep 22, 2:00 pm)
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim, (Sat Sep 22, 12:26 pm)
speck-geostationary