| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| David T Harris | Re: Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)
I know you're not asking about this, but | Sep 22, 10:15 pm 2007 |
| Etienne Robillard | How to upgrade libstdc++ to 4.2 ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Greetings, Is there a way for building libstdc++ and friends without I've managed to upgrade gcc to 3.3.5, but I get the following issue mkdir -p /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC/lib/kern | Sep 22, 9:43 pm 2007 |
| Sean Darby | Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)
I'm not sure if my message (below) went through, it didn't seem to post. Attempting again. Sorry if duplicated. Subject: Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol) Hi, I have been wanting to switch from a GUI "meta"-type chat (uses Yahoo, AIM, etc.) to terminal/CLI-based. I came across "centericq" (apparently it works with multiple protocols) though when trying to install it I get... $ sudo make I'... | Sep 22, 9:05 pm 2007 |
| Etienne Robillard | Re: Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi Sean, While thinking about your post, you could most likely install an As an alternative, maybe you could try compiling ``ysm`` ? [1] Regards, Etienne 1. http://ysmv7.sourceforge.net/ On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:05:57 -0500 | Sep 22, 10:31 pm 2007 |
| Sean Darby | Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)
Hi, I have been wanting to switch from a GUI "meta"-type chat (uses Yahoo, AIM, $ sudo make I'm not a computer guru... don't really know how to resolve that issue. I'm running OpenBSD 4.1 and that install attempt was straight out of 4.1's | Sep 22, 7:53 pm 2007 |
| arronax | (no subject)
subscibe misc | Sep 22, 8:14 pm 2007 |
| Reza Muhammad | Internet slowdown when pf is enabled? Running on i386 -current
Hi guys, I'm having a problem with my Internet connection in my home network. I noticed that my Internet connection has been very slow since I upgraded to -current a week ago. First, I thought it was just my ISP problem. Then, I tried to connect to the Internet directly from my laptop, it worked fine. I noticed that the Internet is slowing down when pf is enabled. I changed my pf.conf to only do nat, and scrub incoming packets, but it is still slow. Here's the output of 'ping' to the Internet. ... | Sep 22, 5:45 pm 2007 |
| Douglas A. Tutty | Re: lock(1) to lock all virtual terminals?
I tried Screen on Debian briefly. I'm not good at remembering magic Thanks, Doug. | Sep 22, 2:33 pm 2007 |
| Jason Dixon | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
On Sep 22, 2007, at 12:28 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com Only in single-user mode, not in a running multi-user system. Please It's a button. Buttons are easily turned off. Ask *any* Linux server --- | Sep 22, 1:48 pm 2007 |
| Douglas A. Tutty | OBSD's perspective on SELinux
Hello all, I'm running OBSD on my older boxes but still Debian on my big box (not Linux has SELinux in its 2.6 kernel and debian has gone ahead and Could someone who knows both the details of OBSDs security enhancements | Sep 22, 11:34 am 2007 |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
The first thing people do when they run with SELinux is disabling it. | Sep 22, 11:27 pm 2007 |
| L. V. Lammert | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
OBSD is UNIX, .. SELinux is Linux. If you want a secure, efficient, SELinux is **NOT** ready for primetime, unless it's changed tremenduously | Sep 22, 7:47 pm 2007 |
| Ted Unangst | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
rhetorical question: why aren't the policies ready? the problem with security by policy is that the policy is always wrong. exercise for the reader: find somebody using SELinux. ask them to | Sep 22, 2:50 pm 2007 |
| Douglas A. Tutty | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
I only know (via the mailing list) people running Debian. Debian comes | Sep 22, 4:21 pm 2007 |
| ttw+bsd | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
On 22.09-16:21, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: i would be willing to bet this will never happen, particularly in a in short, stick to openbsd... | Sep 22, 7:20 pm 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
From what I've seen, 9 times/10, they'll only know they're using | Sep 22, 4:00 pm 2007 |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
The OpenBSD developers are trying to make the most secure UNIX system Additionally, it's not entirely clear whether it actually helps; a Joachim -- | Sep 22, 12:29 pm 2007 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
What part of SELinux is NOT Unix? Remember that all traditional Unix | Sep 22, 12:45 pm 2007 |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
Insofar as that ls -la shows them, yes. In the sense that files actually Root almost always can gain complete control over the system anyway, so Also see my comments below. Still, yes, SELinux can be - rarely - used to solve problems for which Yes, but not all code is created equal. Layering a second permission | Sep 22, 4:39 pm 2007 |
| Darrin Chandler | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
I don't know all the details, and especially not the SELinux details, Not long ago I was talking with a Linux person about security, and they Security should not be grafted on, it should be integrated into the | Sep 22, 12:00 pm 2007 |
| Eduardo Tongson | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
Hi, You might be talking about grsecurity and PaX [1]. SELinux hooks [1] <http://grsecurity.net> Cheers, | Sep 22, 12:52 pm 2007 |
| Jason Dixon | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
If I could add one thing to Darrin's comment (of which I agree SELinux is a button. Buttons are easy to turn off. --- | Sep 22, 12:20 pm 2007 |
| Douglas A. Tutty | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
As I understand it, the patches (the button) are maintained by the US My _personal_ perspective is that OBSD is smaller. You don't have 5,000 Thanks for your ... | Sep 22, 1:21 pm 2007 |
| Ihar Hrachyshka | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
The problem of Linux as a whole is that it tries to resolve security | Sep 22, 1:38 pm 2007 |
| Eduardo Tongson | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
SELinux has clearly defined security mechanisms implemented through | Sep 22, 2:00 pm 2007 |
| Jeffrey 'jf' Lim | Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux
yes you're right. Although that point no longer holds. SELinux is more button, yes. The scary (or "interesting", depending on how you see it) -jf -- | Sep 22, 12:26 pm 2007 |
| Amit Finkler | Does OpenBSD support Hebrew?
Dear subscribers/moderators, Does OpenBSD fully support Hebrew? If indeed it does, how does one make I have already added the following two lines to my .profile: export LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 and this made it possible to show Hebrew filenames under normal KDE | Sep 22, 11:25 am 2007 |
| Jussi Peltola | Re: Does OpenBSD support Hebrew?
Filenames in foreign languages can sometimes be a little problematic, | Sep 22, 12:24 pm 2007 |
| Amit Finkler | Re: Does OpenBSD support Hebrew?
I don't think it has one either. In any case I noticed that indeed perl: warning: Setting locale failed. OK, I checked that and the... | Sep 22, 2:59 pm 2007 |
| Tomoyuki Sakurai | OpenBSD Talk at Open Source Conference 2007 Tokyo/Fall
Hi all, At Open Source Conference 2007 Tokyo/Fall, I'll give an introductory talk Open Source Conference 2007 Tokyo/Fall On Oct. 6, it... | Sep 22, 6:50 am 2007 |
| Dag Leine | umts cell phone as modem
Hi, I'm trying to use the SAMSUNG SHG-L760 over usb as modem. First of all I want to have a 'AT OK' sequence. I've tryed echo and cat Please can anyone give me a hint how to get the communication workin? | Sep 22, 10:37 am 2007 |
| Paul de Weerd | Re: umts cell phone as modem
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:37:11PM +0200, Dag Leine wrote: | Sep 22, 10:49 am 2007 |
| Dag Leine | ioapic with single core kernel?
Hi, I was playing around a long time to get CardBus and sound working on my Since sysctl -> hw.setperf disappears in the mp-kernel regardless using Thx and regards | Sep 22, 8:46 am 2007 |
| n0g0013 | Re: WG: Re: isakmp phase 2 negotiation failed
On 21.09-16:47, Christoph Leser wrote: you were spot on. i'm a little confused as to how my other tunnels -- | Sep 22, 8:08 pm 2007 |
| Aaron | Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?
................... SNIP Is anyone using solid state drives yet? | Sep 22, 12:48 am 2007 |
| RW | Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?
CF is effectively IDE. But I also have a customer using a flash based drive that looks like a | Sep 22, 3:01 am 2007 |
| Eduardo Tongson | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
Check out the HP c-Class BladeSystems offerings. It is sad that HP is | Sep 22, 11:12 pm 2007 |
| Douglas A. Tutty | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
Hi Nick. I understand your reasons. To me they look like reasons for separate If I was going to put them all on one machine, I'd separate the | Sep 22, 12:36 am 2007 |
| Nick Holland | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
Douglas A. Tutty wrote: That's where you are supposed to 1) recognize that my mysteriously Yes, very separate is what I was recommending: no VM, keep them as ... | Sep 22, 10:53 am 2007 |
| Douglas A. Tutty | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
Thanks Nick. I don't catch sarcastic sneer much in person, yet alone Doug. | Sep 22, 11:36 am 2007 |
| Henning Brauer | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
someone just needs to sit down and add the code to put interfaces into -- | Sep 22, 7:29 am 2007 |
| ttw+bsd | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
On 22.09-02:06, Luca Corti wrote: i have a feeling that the funds currently available for your virtualisation | Sep 22, 6:50 pm 2007 |
| Luca Corti | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
If I had such project and funds I'd certainly contribute. In the ciao Luca | Sep 22, 7:35 pm 2007 |
| n0g0013 | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
On 23.09-01:35, Luca Corti wrote: my apologies, i had you confused with the original poster. -- | Sep 22, 8:12 pm 2007 |
| Darren Spruell | Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?
Ironically, today's ISC handler's diary entry talks to this as well. http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3411&rss DS | Sep 22, 7:45 pm 2007 |
| Matthieu Herrb | Re: 1440x900 resolution problem
How many times should I repeat that the current i810 and vesa drivers In the future, Xenocara will be updated to use the intel 2.x driver | Sep 22, 4:01 pm 2007 |
| Steve Shockley | Re: : : OpenBSD Install Goal
http://g.paderni.free.fr/olivebsd/ Doesn't work as part of the install, but at least you can quit the | Sep 22, 2:33 pm 2007 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| None | September 22, 2007 | None |
