openbsd-misc mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
David T Harris
Re: Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)

I know you're not asking about this, but
naim http://naim.n.ml.org is
an excellent console-based AIM, IRC, and ICQ client.
Plus it supports being in multiple chat rooms on IRC
in a very intuitive manner.

Sep 22, 10:15 pm 2007
Etienne Robillard
How to upgrade libstdc++ to 4.2 ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greetings,

Is there a way for building libstdc++ and friends without
having to do a ``make build'' in /usr/src ?

I've managed to upgrade gcc to 3.3.5, but I get the following issue
when compiling a fresh kernel from today's head branch:

mkdir -p /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC/lib/kern
making sure the kern library is up to date...
`libkern.o' is up to date.
making sure the compat library is up to date...
`libcompat.a' is up ...

Sep 22, 9:43 pm 2007
Sean Darby
Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)

I'm not sure if my message (below) went through, it didn't seem to post. Attempting again. Sorry if duplicated.

Subject: Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)

Hi,

I have been wanting to switch from a GUI "meta"-type chat (uses Yahoo, AIM, etc.) to terminal/CLI-based. I came across "centericq" (apparently it works with multiple protocols) though when trying to install it I get...

$ sudo make
===> centericq-4.9.11p0 is marked as broken: requires update but new version has issues.

I'...

Sep 22, 9:05 pm 2007
Etienne Robillard
Re: Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Sean,

While thinking about your post, you could most likely install an
alternative icq client by either looking on some websites, or perhaps
by taking a peek at the FreeBSD ports collection (in the ``net-im ''category).

As an alternative, maybe you could try compiling ``ysm`` ? [1]

Regards,

Etienne

1. http://ysmv7.sourceforge.net/

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:05:57 -0500
iEYEARECAAYFAkb10BgACgkQdXKAffkXj4OmJACfaknkLBCrddLcPYGxigkCwngX...

Sep 22, 10:31 pm 2007
Sean Darby
Instant Messenger (CLI-based multi-protocol)

Hi,

I have been wanting to switch from a GUI "meta"-type chat (uses Yahoo, AIM,
etc.) to terminal/CLI-based. I came across "centericq" (apparently it works
with multiple protocols) though when trying to install it I get...

$ sudo make
===> centericq-4.9.11p0 is marked as broken: requires update but new version
has issues.

I'm not a computer guru... don't really know how to resolve that issue.

I'm running OpenBSD 4.1 and that install attempt was straight out of 4.1's
unaltered ports tree...

Sep 22, 7:53 pm 2007
arronax
(no subject)

subscibe misc

Sep 22, 8:14 pm 2007
Reza Muhammad
Internet slowdown when pf is enabled? Running on i386 -current

Hi guys,

I'm having a problem with my Internet connection in my home network. I noticed that my Internet connection has been very slow since I upgraded to -current a week ago. First, I thought it was just my ISP problem. Then, I tried to connect to the Internet directly from my laptop, it worked fine.

I noticed that the Internet is slowing down when pf is enabled. I changed my pf.conf to only do nat, and scrub incoming packets, but it is still slow. Here's the output of 'ping' to the Internet.

...

Sep 22, 5:45 pm 2007
Douglas A. Tutty
Re: lock(1) to lock all virtual terminals?

I tried Screen on Debian briefly. I'm not good at remembering magic
keystrokes. If necessary, I'll try again. However, since I'm trying to
get used to the OBSD way of doing things, and since this seemed like a
security issue, I wanted to see how to solve this using what is in OBSD
base.

Thanks,

Doug.

Sep 22, 2:33 pm 2007
Jason Dixon
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

On Sep 22, 2007, at 12:28 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com

Only in single-user mode, not in a running multi-user system. Please

It's a button. Buttons are easily turned off. Ask *any* Linux server
admin. Odds are 10-1 they've disabled SELinux.

---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net

Sep 22, 1:48 pm 2007
Douglas A. Tutty
OBSD's perspective on SELinux

Hello all,

I'm running OBSD on my older boxes but still Debian on my big box (not
ready yet).

Linux has SELinux in its 2.6 kernel and debian has gone ahead and
compiled SELinux into the libraries, although the SELinux policies
aren't ready on debian yet. The whole focus seems to be to make Linux
"more secure". I'm not sure what to make of it. I figure that if you
want secure, you switch to OBSD.

Could someone who knows both the details of OBSDs security enhancements
and the details of SELi...

Sep 22, 11:34 am 2007
Marco Peereboom
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

The first thing people do when they run with SELinux is disabling it.
You decide how great it is.

Sep 22, 11:27 pm 2007
L. V. Lammert
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

OBSD is UNIX, .. SELinux is Linux. If you want a secure, efficient,
compact OS done by folks you can trust and actually talk to, use OBSD; if
you want 'fairly secure Linux' [which has had thousands of hand in it
including NSA, as mentioned previousy], use OpenSUSE with ***AppArmor***.
Simple and easy to implement, even by less senior Admins.

SELinux is **NOT** ready for primetime, unless it's changed tremenduously
in the past couple of years. Last time we tried it, management was totally
arcane and...

Sep 22, 7:47 pm 2007
Ted Unangst
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

rhetorical question: why aren't the policies ready?

the problem with security by policy is that the policy is always wrong.

exercise for the reader: find somebody using SELinux. ask them to
describe their policy over the phone. then repeat it back to them.
did you get it right?

Sep 22, 2:50 pm 2007
Douglas A. Tutty
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

I only know (via the mailing list) people running Debian. Debian comes
with the SELinux patches compiled into the libraries and kernel but the
SELinux policies haven't been integrated into the "Debian way of doing
things yet". In other words, since debian packages, by policy, must
"just work" on install (come with a reasonable default setup), (except
for a few things like the Shorewall firewall builder that installs to a
disabled state that prints a warning), once Debian decides on a SELinux
poli...

Sep 22, 4:21 pm 2007
ttw+bsd
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

On 22.09-16:21, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

i would be willing to bet this will never happen, particularly in a
community like debian's. if, by some miracle, it does i'd make a
further bet that they'll have to roll back the decision because
their users will be crippled. basically, good programming practices
get you a lot more for a lot less than wide ethos changes. having
said that the extended feature set of selinux can solve issues that
"unix" systems are not able to.

in short, stick to openbsd...

Sep 22, 7:20 pm 2007
Stuart Henderson
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

From what I've seen, 9 times/10, they'll only know they're using
it if they had to disable it to fix an app with a broken policy...

Sep 22, 4:00 pm 2007
Joachim Schipper
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

The OpenBSD developers are trying to make the most secure UNIX system
they can; SELinux might or might not be secure, but it's not UNIX.

Additionally, it's not entirely clear whether it actually helps; a
SELinux configuration is, even at its best, a lot more complex than the
equivalent UNIX-ish configuration. Thus, it becomes more likely that
there will be either configuration or coding errors.

Joachim

--
TFMotD: kadmin (8) - Kerberos administration utility

Sep 22, 12:29 pm 2007
Ihar Hrachyshka
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

What part of SELinux is NOT Unix? Remember that all traditional Unix
For example for blocking some critical operations for ALL users, even
root. Of course, that's the case when strict traditional
Unix-awareness is not so critical as the security of the system by
Every security feature, every OS improvement IS an additional code.
That's the problem of proper kernel and security policies audit, not

Sep 22, 12:45 pm 2007
Joachim Schipper
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

Insofar as that ls -la shows them, yes. In the sense that files actually

Root almost always can gain complete control over the system anyway, so
that's not a big issue.

Also see my comments below.

Still, yes, SELinux can be - rarely - used to solve problems for which
no clean UNIX-ish solution exists. Far too often, though, it's thought

Yes, but not all code is created equal. Layering a second permission
layer into the system integrates closely with all other security
mechanisms, which is ...

Sep 22, 4:39 pm 2007
Darrin Chandler
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

I don't know all the details, and especially not the SELinux details,
but that won't stop me from commenting.

Not long ago I was talking with a Linux person about security, and they
pointed me to a set of patches that did a lot of nifty stuff. Good
stuff, like the things you find OpenBSD doing. But it's not in the
mainline kernel, it's a set of patches.

Security should not be grafted on, it should be integrated into the
main development process. I'm sure the patch maintainers are doing their
b...

Sep 22, 12:00 pm 2007
Eduardo Tongson
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

Hi,

You might be talking about grsecurity and PaX [1]. SELinux hooks
through the LSM [2] framework. LSM was designed to be easily enabled
and disabled, so that should be a fundamental flaw. LSM has valid
criticisms [3] [4].

[1] <http://grsecurity.net>
[2] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Security_Modules>
[3] <http://www.grsecurity.net/lsm.php>
[4] <http://www.rsbac.org/documentation/why_rsbac_does_not_use_lsm>

Cheers,
Ed

Sep 22, 12:52 pm 2007
Jason Dixon
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

If I could add one thing to Darrin's comment (of which I agree
completely), it would be this:

SELinux is a button. Buttons are easy to turn off.

---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net

Sep 22, 12:20 pm 2007
Douglas A. Tutty
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

As I understand it, the patches (the button) are maintained by the US
NSA; I suppose as a service to their fellow Americans. That likely
brings out the conspiracy theorists who say that there's probably a
back-door to allow NSA to read your ssh keys, GPG/PGP keys, whatever.

My _personal_ perspective is that OBSD is smaller. You don't have 5,000
or whatever people changing the kernel, plus NSA putting their thumb in
it. You have my Fellow Canadian Theo and people he trusts.

Thanks for your ...

Sep 22, 1:21 pm 2007
Ihar Hrachyshka
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

The problem of Linux as a whole is that it tries to resolve security
problems not by auditing code but by implementing SELinux. But what
the problem would be if OpenBSD has "SeBSD" extension? It's just one
of security features, and I don't see the matter for blaming on
SELinux. Linux security flaws are not there but in Linux kernel as a

Sep 22, 1:38 pm 2007
Eduardo Tongson
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

SELinux has clearly defined security mechanisms implemented through
different components. It is doing what it was designed for. The real
problem with SELinux is the way it hooks to the Linux kernel. The
inaccurate marketing of this tool doesn't help too, unsuspecting users
are blindly using it as a magical security solution.

Sep 22, 2:00 pm 2007
Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
Re: OBSD's perspective on SELinux

yes you're right. Although that point no longer holds. SELinux is more
or less "official" now. But for a looong (long) time, it was pretty
apparent what the focus of the developers was *not* on.... And even

button, yes. The scary (or "interesting", depending on how you see it)
bit is that there is a whole infrastructure (LKM) behind it making it
easy(?) to create, and plug in your own buttons to do your own funky
stuff...

-jf

--
In the meantime, here is your PSA:
"It's so hard to write a...

Sep 22, 12:26 pm 2007
Amit Finkler
Does OpenBSD support Hebrew?

Dear subscribers/moderators,

Does OpenBSD fully support Hebrew? If indeed it does, how does one make
applications in X/KDE properly see/present Hebrew letters and filenames?

I have already added the following two lines to my .profile:

export LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8
export LC_COLLATE=he_IL.UTF-8

and this made it possible to show Hebrew filenames under normal KDE
applications properly. However, when I tried opening an OpenOffice
files, for example, which had Hebrew letters in it, it all appeared
...

Sep 22, 11:25 am 2007
Jussi Peltola
Re: Does OpenBSD support Hebrew?

Filenames in foreign languages can sometimes be a little problematic,
because Unix doesn't really have any standard on how to store them on
disk - filenames are just byte arrays. Because a machine may have users
with different locales this can make sharing files very difficult, so
the desktop environments seem to be storing filenames in UTF-8 with no
regard to the locale.
GTK apps also look at the environment variable G_FILENAME_ENCODING,
which you may want to define, but if memory serves me correctl...

Sep 22, 12:24 pm 2007
Amit Finkler
Re: Does OpenBSD support Hebrew?

I don't think it has one either. In any case I noticed that indeed
the two "sets" weren't really accepted by the system:

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_CTYPE = "he_IL.UTF-8",
LC_COLLATE = "he_IL.UTF-8",
LANG = (unset)
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").

OK, I checked that and the...

Sep 22, 2:59 pm 2007
Tomoyuki Sakurai
OpenBSD Talk at Open Source Conference 2007 Tokyo/Fall

Hi all,

At Open Source Conference 2007 Tokyo/Fall, I'll give an introductory talk
about OpenBSD (in Japanese). The talk will be aimed at sysadmins who know the
name but haven't used OpenBSD yet. It would be nice to have a chat with
OpenBSD users in Japan after the talk. If you happen to be in or near Tokyo
area on Oct. 5, please let me know.

Open Source Conference 2007 Tokyo/Fall
http://www.ospn.jp/osc2007-fall/
http://www.ospn.jp/osc2007-fall/modules/eguide/event.php?eid=43

On Oct. 6, it...

Sep 22, 6:50 am 2007
Dag Leine
umts cell phone as modem

Hi,

I'm trying to use the SAMSUNG SHG-L760 over usb as modem.
OpenBSD recognise it as umodem0 (dmesg attached) and assigns ucom0.

First of all I want to have a 'AT OK' sequence. I've tryed echo and cat
as well as a small perl script sending 'AT\r\n' to /dev/cuaU0 and read
from it. While sending seams to work, there is no answer from the cell
phone.

Please can anyone give me a hint how to get the communication workin?
(The cell phone is ok, under Windows I can talk to it with an teminal
client...

Sep 22, 10:37 am 2007
Paul de Weerd
Re: umts cell phone as modem

On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 04:37:11PM +0200, Dag Leine wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I'm trying to use the SAMSUNG SHG-L760 over usb as modem.
| OpenBSD recognise it as umodem0 (dmesg attached) and assigns ucom0.
|
| First of all I want to have a 'AT OK' sequence. I've tryed echo and cat
| as well as a small perl script sending 'AT\r\n' to /dev/cuaU0 and read
| from it. While sending seams to work, there is no answer from the cell
| phone.
|
| Please can anyone give me a hint how to get the communication workin?...

Sep 22, 10:49 am 2007
Dag Leine
ioapic with single core kernel?

Hi,

I was playing around a long time to get CardBus and sound working on my
JVC MP-XP741. I've found, that the GENERIC.MP kernel support both if
enableing acpi. To my poor mind, it seems that ioapic is needed, but
simply adding it to the GENERIG confiuration file doesn't work.

Since sysctl -> hw.setperf disappears in the mp-kernel regardless using
acpi or not, I'd like to add ioapic to the GENERIC kernel. Are there any
sugestions?

Thx and regards
Dag Leine
OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC) #4: Sat ...

Sep 22, 8:46 am 2007
n0g0013
Re: WG: Re: isakmp phase 2 negotiation failed

On 21.09-16:47, Christoph Leser wrote:

you were spot on. i'm a little confused as to how my other tunnels
are working and also what the difference between transforms and suites
are but i _think_ that transforms are for phase-1 and suites are for
phase-2. still not quite sure the deliniator there but thanks again
... working like a charm.

--
t
t
w

Sep 22, 8:08 pm 2007
Aaron
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

................... SNIP

Is anyone using solid state drives yet?

Sep 22, 12:48 am 2007
RW
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

CF is effectively IDE.
Witness (a firewall here):
# disklabel wd0
# Inside MBR partition 3: type A6 start 63 size 1000881
# /dev/rwd0c:
type: ESDI
disk: ESDI/IDE disk
label: SanDisk SDCFB-51
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 16
sectors/cylinder: 1008
cylinders: 993
total sectors: 1000944
rpm: 3600
8>< snip!

But I also have a customer using a flash based drive that looks like a
3.5" IDE job.
It cost heaps but she loves the speed of random access and I love...

Sep 22, 3:01 am 2007
Eduardo Tongson
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

Check out the HP c-Class BladeSystems offerings. It is sad that HP is
marketing it with virtualization via Vmware. Just disregard the vmware
affair.

Sep 22, 11:12 pm 2007
Douglas A. Tutty
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

Hi Nick.

I understand your reasons. To me they look like reasons for separate
firewalls on separate boxes. In the scenarios you mention, would you
put separate firewalls on one machine?

If I was going to put them all on one machine, I'd separate the
administration of the box itself (me) from the people responsible for
rule sub-sets. E.g. if one sub-firewall is dealing with traffic between
NICs 1 & 2 (call it channel A), another between NICs 3 & 4 (call it
channel B), I'd have the...

Sep 22, 12:36 am 2007
Nick Holland
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

That's where you are supposed to 1) recognize that my mysteriously
mangled e-mail address is me and 2) Read back to my previous statement
where I stated that I don't feel VM technology is suitable for
externally exposed apps or security critical apps and 3) catch the
implied sarcastic sneer in "If one believed in the idea of 'a perfect
VM environment'"

Yes, very separate is what I was recommending: no VM, keep them as
separate as possible. When appropriate, of course.

...

Sep 22, 10:53 am 2007
Douglas A. Tutty
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

Thanks Nick. I don't catch sarcastic sneer much in person, yet alone
via email.

Doug.

Sep 22, 11:36 am 2007
Henning Brauer
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

someone just needs to sit down and add the code to put interfaces into
alternate routing tables and arp running there and you can have that on
openbsd.
ok, it is a bit of work (that I am not very interested in).
but the hard part (introduction of multiple routing tables) is already
done.

--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg &am...

Sep 22, 7:29 am 2007
ttw+bsd
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

On 22.09-02:06, Luca Corti wrote:

i have a feeling that the funds currently available for your virtualisation
project would improve the quality and delivery of these requirements.

Sep 22, 6:50 pm 2007
Luca Corti
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

If I had such project and funds I'd certainly contribute. In the
meantime I have assigned part of my limited resources to buying the CDs
for the new release...

ciao

Luca

Sep 22, 7:35 pm 2007
n0g0013
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

On 23.09-01:35, Luca Corti wrote:

my apologies, i had you confused with the original poster.

--
t
t
w

Sep 22, 8:12 pm 2007
Darren Spruell
Re: OpenBSD firewalls as virtual machine ?

Ironically, today's ISC handler's diary entry talks to this as well.

http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3411&rss

DS

Sep 22, 7:45 pm 2007
Matthieu Herrb
Re: 1440x900 resolution problem

How many times should I repeat that the current i810 and vesa drivers
can only use the modes that the BIOS knows about?
You need to use the i915resolution from ports to "fix" your bios for now.

In the future, Xenocara will be updated to use the intel 2.x driver
which doesn't rely on the BIOS for defining the modes anymore, it
should make things easier. (Although the BIOS is still needed for
other informations, and it turns out that there are also lots of
quirks there,,,)

Sep 22, 4:01 pm 2007
Steve Shockley
Re: : : OpenBSD Install Goal

http://g.paderni.free.fr/olivebsd/

Doesn't work as part of the install, but at least you can quit the
install and look up something if you only have one computer.

Sep 22, 2:33 pm 2007
previous daytodaynext day
NoneSeptember 22, 2007None