On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:34:33AM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
The OpenBSD developers are trying to make the most secure UNIX system
they can; SELinux might or might not be secure, but it's not UNIX.
Additionally, it's not entirely clear whether it actually helps; a
SELinux configuration is, even at its best, a lot more complex than the
equivalent UNIX-ish configuration. Thus, it becomes more likely that
there will be either configuration or coding errors.
Joachim
--
TFMotD: kadmin (8) - Kerberos administration utility
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| David Brown | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc2 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
