On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:34:33AM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
The OpenBSD developers are trying to make the most secure UNIX system
they can; SELinux might or might not be secure, but it's not UNIX.
Additionally, it's not entirely clear whether it actually helps; a
SELinux configuration is, even at its best, a lot more complex than the
equivalent UNIX-ish configuration. Thus, it becomes more likely that
there will be either configuration or coding errors.
Joachim
--
TFMotD: kadmin (8) - Kerberos administration utility
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| WANG Cong | Re: WANTED: kernel projects for CS students |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10606] 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530 |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Stephen Tweedie | Unmounting root (no kidding!) [was: Some Linux problems---solved] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
