Hello all, I'm running OBSD on my older boxes but still Debian on my big box (not ready yet). Linux has SELinux in its 2.6 kernel and debian has gone ahead and compiled SELinux into the libraries, although the SELinux policies aren't ready on debian yet. The whole focus seems to be to make Linux "more secure". I'm not sure what to make of it. I figure that if you want secure, you switch to OBSD. Could someone who knows both the details of OBSDs security enhancements and the details of SELinux comment? Please note: this is _not_ a troll, flame-ware-tinder-box, whatever. I'm genuinly interested. Thanks, Doug.
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| monstr | Microblaze init port |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Back to the future. |
git: | |
| Petr Baudis | Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts |
| Jan Engelhardt | about c8af1de9 (git status uses pager) |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Marco Peereboom | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Newman | setting dscp or tos bits |
| Khalid Schofield | Configuring sendmail openbsd 4.2 |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| Johannes Berg | [RFC v2] mac80211: assign needed_headroom/tailroom for netdevs |
| Francois Romieu | Re: NAPI, rx_no_buffer_count, e1000, r8169 and other actors |
