Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
...
That's where you are supposed to 1) recognize that my mysteriously
mangled e-mail address is me and 2) Read back to my previous statement
where I stated that I don't feel VM technology is suitable for
externally exposed apps or security critical apps and 3) catch the
implied sarcastic sneer in "If one believed in the idea of 'a perfect
VM environment'"
Yes, very separate is what I was recommending: no VM, keep them as
separate as possible. When appropriate, of course.
VMware and related technologies look cool, but it's an extra layer
of complexity and security vulnerabilities. It is also a technology
where the track record is "Coolness first, security when they catch
us with our pants down". It is also something that is rarely done
properly (for my definition of "properly"), but that's a different
discussion for a different list.
Nick.
| Justin C. Sherrill | Re: pkgsrc bulk build and tiff |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Ingo Molnar | [crash, bisected] Kernel BUG at ffffffff8079afb1 (__netif_schedule()) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: tbench wrt. loopback TSO |
