Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: misc@openbsd.org <misc@...>
Date: Saturday, September 22, 2007 - 3:01 am

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:48:11 -0500, Aaron wrote:

>................... SNIP

CF is effectively IDE.
Witness (a firewall here):
# disklabel wd0
# Inside MBR partition 3: type A6 start 63 size 1000881
# /dev/rwd0c:
type: ESDI
disk: ESDI/IDE disk
label: SanDisk SDCFB-51
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 16
sectors/cylinder: 1008
cylinders: 993
total sectors: 1000944
rpm: 3600
8>< snip!

But I also have a customer using a flash based drive that looks like a
3.5" IDE job.
It cost heaps but she loves the speed of random access and I love the
cool quiet(er) machine.

In the beginning was The Word
and The Word was Content-type: text/plain
The Word of Rod.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?, Jan Stary, (Fri Sep 21, 7:33 am)
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?, Aaron, (Sat Sep 22, 12:48 am)
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?, RW, (Sat Sep 22, 3:01 am)
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?, Craig Skinner, (Fri Sep 21, 10:57 am)
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?, Nick Holland, (Fri Sep 21, 9:49 am)
Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?, Jan Stary, (Fri Sep 21, 10:53 am)