List,

Does anyone know of an embedded single board computer, much like a
WRAP/ALIX.C, which has at least one miniPCIe slot?

having no luck on the intertubes am i right in thinking that these board
just are not suitable for 802.11n networking? considering power
requirements, bus bandwidth etc etc

Any thoughts welcome

poncenby

Hi,

I'm trying to concatenate 2 disks using ccd. With an interleave factor
of 0, as described by the man page of ccd(4), it doesn't work. An
interleave factor of 1 works, though. Also, the fstype is 4.2BSD in my
example, but there's no difference if I set it to CCD.

This resembles a bug that was fixed March 30th, 2007:
http://archive.openbsd.nu/?ml=openbsd-bugs&a=2007-03&t=3406566.

User error or system error?

# cat /etc/ccd.conf
# $OpenBSD: ccd.conf,v 1.1 1996/08/24 20:5...

Vous avez besoin pour votre entreprise et aussi ` titre personnel de sauvegarder vos anciens films (8, Super8, VHS, Hi8, Video8, DV et autres) et leur donner une nouvelle jeunesse en les mettant sur DVD, ceci ` moindre co{t. Ne cherchez plus, nous sommes l`.

Nous sommes prisents sur le marchi depuis 10 ans avec des appareils professionnels, nous vous rendrons un risultat comparable ` l'original et souvent mjme mieux.

Ceci pour des films magnitiques mais aussi super8, 8mm et 16mm.
Nous vous invitons `...

On 9/21/07, rwaite1@tampabay.rr.com <rwaite1@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
[snip]

You can lookup support for the Execution Disable Bit for your
processor at http://processorfinder.intel.com/Default.aspx
For example http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL99W

=Adriaan=

OK :-)
I did this on a 4.1/i386.
For other versions it would be similar however since we are going to
use the Skype Linux Binary we will need an x86 system. Linux emulation
is available only for x86 systems.

1) Enable Linux Emulation option in kernel

You will have a line

#kern.emul.linux=1 # enable running Linux binaries

in your "/etc/sysctl.conf" file. You need to uncomment it ( remove the
# in the begining ) and make it look like

kern.emul.linux=1 # enable...

I recently got a Soekris net5501, which is uncannily similar (I
guess they're both based on the same reference design), and moved
the same kind of infrastructure functions to that box, so I had to

Do you want to do kernel development and debugging on that box?

It depends on how you view the machine. I decided to forgo the
usual multiuser system approach and treat the box as an appliance.
The whole point is that it will just sit there, performs its job,
and I won't have to touch it. I didn...

Hi,

I tryed to set up spamd on OpenBSD4.1

but after "preloading" the database at /var/db/spamd

using:

isabsd # /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d
Getting http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/nixspam.gz
blacklist nixspam 39960 entries
whitelist override 40138 entries
Getting http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/chinacidr.txt.gz
blacklist china 431 entries
whitelist override 609 entries
Getting http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/koreacidr.txt.gz
blacklist korea 270 entries
whitelist override 448 entries

spamdb doe...

See your pf(4) table <spamd>

pfctl -t spamd -T show | wc -l

That is unrelated. spamdb only touches the hash database on the
filesystem. Also spamd itself doesn't use the pf <spamd> table -- it uses
the pf <spamd-white> table.

Jeremy C. Reed

> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-misc@openbsd.org
[mailto:owner-misc@openbsd.org]Im Auftrag
> von n0g0013
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 23:52
> An: misc@openbsd.org
> Betreff: isakmp phase 2 negotiation failed
>
>
> having a nightmare getting two openbsd (one 3.8, one 4.0) boxes to
> setup a tunnel. finally got the phase 1 negotiation going (or so i
> believe from reviewing the logs) but it appears that the phase two
...

Remote sysloging

OK, ext_if="fxp0" && int_if="vr0" for me then. (Made me read your post
at bottom of http://archive.openbsd.nu/?ml=openbsd-misc&a=2004-01&t=18114

This isn't really a concern in my situation - about the only thing
the box will ever write is syslog messages (to an internal @loghost,

There is a lifelong waranty for the CF card anyway, so I will just

The only other storage option on the ALIX board is a 44pin IDE; the CF
card is quieter and eats less yticirtcele, which is more ...

Hello Everybody,

Supposing I have several identical NIC's in my server, can I predict
which become int0, which become int1, etc?

A link to document explaining (or man something) would absolutely suffice.
Thank you.
--

With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov

I.e. they depend on the PCI slot they inserted, if I get you correct.
Well, thank you for so in-depth explanation, but what I meant really
was: is it guaranteed that if one take a card from the server and then
install the other card of the same make to the same slot, it will have
the same id?
I will do more research about it , however.... :-)

The best thing however would be to have the ability to set the name of
an intreface based on it's mac address, perhaps somebody is working on
it/having ...

Buy Foreclosures Half Price
Buy and sell foreclosures
Search over 1.2 million listings

Reply with "Send Info" & I'll show you how!

Some commercial firewalls (i.e. Juniper/NetScreen ScreenOS-based gear)
have been offering virtual-systems for years now. I think the negative
comments received here may be appropriate when sharing the system with
non-secure guest OSs, but it seems that it might be alright if its
nothing but firewalls

Cheers,
Kent

I don't understand the logic of having multiple firewalls on one box.
If one box can handle the throughput requirements of all the NICs, why
not just one big firewall?

Doug.

Overlapping IP address space.

ciao

Luca

You are not always in control of all things. Powerful technology is
about choice, not about one absolute right way. BTW, NAT sucks.

ciao

Luca

We are talking about OpenBSD here, and support for VRF is not there.

ciao

Luca

These are great news. If the implementation will allow to assign
interfaces to different VRFs it would solve the virtual router/firewall
setup without the need for OS virtualization.

ciao

Luca

(I'd hoped you would have prefaced that with a statement like "these
are my stock options talking, but...")

This is the kind of bad advice that virtualization companies (and
naive users of those technologies) need to stop spreading. This
security model is flawed, and people should not rely on these virtual
machine environments to provide firewall services.

Here's an entirely realistic scenario at this point:

- Administrator pays loads of money for VMware ESX; for better ROI, he
intends to re...

When I provided patch support for Solaris 10, the number of times that a
patch would not add to the global zone, thus affecting all local zones
on the host, was fairly common. This affected airlines, banks and oil
companies that you have heard of......

I know an OS is different to a VM platform, but you are still relying on
someone else to do their bit. And just because you have a lottery ticket
worth of support contract does not mean that it will actually get
patched in a timely manner, fr...

I'll echo Nick's statements here. Virtualization does not provide
reliable enough segmentation to rely on for security assurance. Do not
buy into the market smack the vendors are putting out about it.

As far as that goes, the more time goes on, the weaker the assumption
of virtualized segmentation becomes. Research from IntelGuardians and
other groups appears to be coming closer to completely unraveling
virtualization security, at least in terms of how it's implemented in
VMware for example. See ...

On 20.09-19:17, Daniel Ouellet wrote:

thanks for the advice. unfortunately both systems are off-site
production machines and cannot be easily upgraded. i will try
manually keying the tunnel in the short term. thanks again

--
t
t
w

do you have an errata number?