Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <misc@...>

Subject: Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?

Date: Friday, September 21, 2007 - 4:55 pm

Sorry, iirc it was in that link that Theo posted on core 2 errata.
Hopefully I didn't read it incorrectly. But I disclaim everything...

On 9/21/07, Ted Unangst wrote:

quoted text

> On 9/21/07, bofh wrote:
> > Isn't one of the core2 bugs that nx is only honored for one of the
> > cores but not the other?
>
> do you have an errata number?
>

--
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, , (Thu Sep 20, 4:41 pm)

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, Darren Spruell, (Thu Sep 20, 5:59 pm)

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, Ted Unangst, (Thu Sep 20, 6:13 pm)

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, bofh, (Fri Sep 21, 4:21 pm)

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, Ted Unangst, (Fri Sep 21, 4:33 pm)

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, bofh, (Fri Sep 21, 4:55 pm)

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?, Ted Unangst, (Fri Sep 21, 6:07 pm)


linux-kernel:
Ingo Molnar	[patch 12/13] syslets: x86: optimized copy_uatom()
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 017/196] aoechr: Convert from class_device to device
Yinghai Lu	Re: 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6
Jan Engelhardt	intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
git:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Natalie Protasevich	[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc:

Re: Is AMD64 page out of date about W^X?

Online users