Re: Forward traffic on incoming port help

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter N. M. Hansteen
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 - 1:43 am

"Jake Conk" <jake.conk@gmail.com> writes:


PF is in the base system and pretty easy to configure for setups like
the one you describe -


Assuming your local net is NATed with unroutable addresses on the LAN,
the traffic is directed to a routable address but the computer you
want to receive the traffic is on a nonroutable address inside, some
basic redirection (rdr) should do the trick.

I'm a bit interested in why you should be looking for a different and
probably more difficult way to do it.  Are there any specific things
in your setup which would break with PF?

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Forward traffic on incoming port help, Jake Conk, (Thu Sep 20, 1:03 am)
Re: Forward traffic on incoming port help, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Thu Sep 20, 1:43 am)
Re: Forward traffic on incoming port help, Jake Conk, (Thu Sep 20, 7:17 pm)
Re: Forward traffic on incoming port help, Jason Dixon, (Thu Sep 20, 7:32 pm)
Re: Forward traffic on incoming port help, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:30 am)
Re: Forward traffic on incoming port help, Jake Conk, (Fri Sep 21, 3:28 am)