(1)Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>>> Yes. The *rights you received* are the central point of the question.
Do you really have so much problems with logical reasoning? I get the
feeling that you are just trolling, nothing more.
Again, slowly written, so that you can follow ((slowly) read it over and
over again until you understand):
> * Copyright (c) 2007 Jiri Slaby
This part grants you the right to distribute the software under the
terms of the GPL.
That means you receive the right to distribute the software under the
terms of the GPL.
This means you receive the right.
This means this right is one right of all the rights you received.
Hey, didn't (1) talk about the rights you received? Now I wonder if the
right you just received is a right you received.
So, either:
a) you didn't receive this right, so you are not allowed to distribute
the software under the terms of the GPL, or
b) you did receive this right and thus have to pass on this right. If
not, you're not complying with the GPL. Which is okay, because
c) you can still distribute the software under the terms of the BSD
license, which nevertheless states that you have to retain the copyright
notice and the license terms.
It's really easy, almost binary: Either you receive the right, then you
receive the right. Or you don't receive the right and you can not make
use of the right.
But I guess you won't agree here, because this is logic, but you want
written proof.
cheers
simon
--
IF YOU READ THIS, YOU ARE STUPID.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (written, thus true)
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Gabriel C | modpost errors ( Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1) |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Press, Jonathan | RE: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface foron access scann... |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 13/37] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl |
