Hello!
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 03:25:13PM +0300, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
I'd think in essence, the "intersection" of the license of the original
work (the dual-license) and the license of the substantial
modifications/additions (GPL). However one must retain the original
dual-license, anyhow, in my eyes. For example stating that that
dual-license applies only to part of the (derived) work (i.e. that part
that's from the original work).
Kind regards,
Hannah.
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.26-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
git: | |
