On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 10:32:05AM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:

quoted text
> Because of the choice between licenses you can either choose to adhere

> to the GPL (thus forcing you to open up your changes)

                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That is false, only if software is distributed.
> or alternatively

quoted text
> you can choose the BSD and either give your patches back or not.

Either give your patches back or not is also available on the GNU GPL as

long as you don't distribute software.
> Still, you can't remove either of the licenses, you have to pass on the

quoted text
> rights you have gotten from the original copyright holder down to

> anybody else you are giving this too.

Well, no. The original copyright holder gave you a choice: either BSD or GPL
> And especially if you would be

quoted text
> giving the file down to the author only under GPL your are limiting

> their freedom, which is not the intent of the original copyright holder

> and also something you fortunately can't be doing.

Tough luck.
> If you don't like the licensing, then don't use the code at all, don't

quoted text
> even look at it.

Likewise, if you don't like the GPL, don't let it be a choice for other users.
If your problem is that people don't give back, go knock on certain vendors who

profit from OpenSSH without contributin anything back. Oh wait... they don't

have to, have they? :)
Rui
--

Or is it?

Today is Setting Orange, the 26th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173

+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown

+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,

| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi

+ So let's do it...?