On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:46:30PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm not the one calling people names.
I wanted to understand the facts but nobody here wants to acknowledge that
3 of those files have *alternative* licensing.
I agree fully with you all in the other 5 files which are not dual licensed.
The full story I needed to know is clear on those 8 files involved in the diff
on lkml you shows us, what I wanted to know is your understanding. I see now
you seem to pretend that GPLv2 can't be chosen for those 3 files.
> > The copyright notice tells the user he can choose between two licenses.
Sure, let's make a gentleman's bet. If on those three files that are dual
licensed, I'm wrong, I'll donate 50 EUR to OpenBSD.
I also encourage those who agree with me to do so as well.
If you're wrong, you'll say sorry, publicly, ok?
Again, I'm talking only about the 3 files that are dual licensed, since on
the other 5 I agree with you, fully.
Rui
--
P'tang!
Today is Setting Orange, the 26th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Con Kolivas | [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 |
git: | |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 03/17] vbus: add connection-client helper infrastructure |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 03/30] solos: FPGA and firmware update support. |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
