On 01/09/07, Theo de Raadt  wrote:

quoted text
> When companies have taken our wireless device drivers, many many of

> them have given changes and fixes back.  Some maybe didn't, but that

> is OK.

>

> When Linux took our changes back, they immediately locked the door

> against changes moving back, by putting a GPL license on guard.

>

> Why does our brother Linux take a file that is 90% BSD licensed,

> and refuse to let us see the 10% he adds?

Indeed, it's upsetting that people like Luis Rodriguez push for the

lawyers to be involved to (fight?) an open source project. Why, may I

ask?
Why Luis puts the phrase "legal hell" next to entirely free software?

[0] Why is he trying to go against the BSD community, which gave him

the entire HAL framework for the driver in question?
Best regards,

Constantine.
[0] http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=118857712529898&w=2