Uh, why do we need to defer to courts and seek legal funds and feed the
sharks er lawyers just to comprehend what the two words "without
modification"?As I explained to a friend of mine minutes ago ..
adding GPL to BSD is sad to the BSD people (we can't use the GPL code then)
adding GPL and removing BSD is not legal
Who's side are you on anyway suggesting legal battles? The lawyers, the
companies, or free software?On Saturday 01 September 2007 16:45:50 Reiner Jung wrote:
--
Todd Fries .. todd@fries.net
_____________________________________________
| \ 1.636.410.0632 (voice)
| Free Daemon Consulting \ 1.405.227.9094 (voice)
| http://FreeDaemonConsulting.com \ 1.866.792.3418 (FAX)
| "..in support of free software solutions." \ 250797 (FWD)
| \
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
37E7 D3EB 74D0 8D66 A68D B866 0326 204E 3F42 004A
http://todd.fries.net/pgp.txt
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Tony Lindgren | [PATCH 37/90] ARM: OMAP: MPUIO wake updates |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Dushan Tcholich | Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 |
