On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 07:25:29AM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
I've written it, and swore never again to do so unless life depends on
it. You have to be extremely skilled and with an excessive ammount of
free time to make an argument based on that defense.
Whilst the first case is a compliment, the second not really (but not an
insult either).
> Has the state of the art gone down that badly in the last forty-odd years?
Yeah sure, like OpenBSD is 100% written in machine code *giggle*
Rui
--
Grudnuk demand sustenance!
Today is Pungenday, the 39th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
| Zhang, Yanmin | AIM7 40% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 |
| Con Kolivas | [PATCH][RSDL-mm 0/7] RSDL cpu scheduler for 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 |
| Nick Piggin | [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear) |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
