On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 07:25:29AM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
I've written it, and swore never again to do so unless life depends on
it. You have to be extremely skilled and with an excessive ammount of
free time to make an argument based on that defense.
Whilst the first case is a compliment, the second not really (but not an
insult either).
> Has the state of the art gone down that badly in the last forty-odd years?
Yeah sure, like OpenBSD is 100% written in machine code *giggle*
Rui
--
Grudnuk demand sustenance!
Today is Pungenday, the 39th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Eric Sandeen | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / | request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-1 (is Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ben Greear | Re: MACVLANs really best solution? How about a bridge with multiple bridge virtual... |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.29-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 |
