On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:29:31PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:

quoted text
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:

> >I'd love to see how an user who gets a modified binary version has the

> >freedom to modify it. Go ahead. Prove me that it doesn't allow some users

> >to loose freedom...

>

> You make the point of using BLOB so well, Thank you!

>

> Looking forward to see you fight for documentation freedom and no NDA

> that reduce and eliminate freedom.

I fully support that fight!
> But, lets not loose sight that a violation of a copyright was done, and

quoted text
> as it look from the outside was endorse here.

>

> Richard, I am soooo surprise by your silence as violation of copyright

> are done by a movement you fight so hard to create long ago. I can't say

> what to make of it.

I ca't talk for Richard, but I see no "movement" doing such thing, apart from

a few guys, who I should point out that I don't think they really share the

Free Software ideals, in the Linux kernel community did those violations.

And only on some files which were *not* dual licensed.
Rui
--

Wibble.

Today is Pungenday, the 39th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173

+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown

+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,

| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi

+ So let's do it...?