On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:39 +0000, Sebastien Carlier wrote:
If you call the power to handcuff users to your customized code based on
a BSD-licensed original an additional "freedom", then you're right, and
you should be working for Microsoft, Apple, or some other company that
makes their profits by putting walls between computer users.
I don't call that a freedom. That's no more a right than the right to
keep another human being as a slave. We (in the US) got rid of that
particular broken system over a century ago, and for good reason.
--
Shawn K. Quinn
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
