On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:53:23AM -0400, Tony Abernethy wrote:

quoted text
> GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE

>                        Version 2, June 1991

>

>  Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

>                           675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

>  Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies

>  of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

>

> Seems extremely unlikely that this would give a license to change other license or copyright documents. Or that could possible be the intended effect. I doubt it would be legal/ethical/whatever to take something GPL-licensed and re-license it as BSD-licensed (except with explicit consent of the copyright/etc owner(s)).

Are you intentionally daft? Nobody here defended that. You seem to have your issues confused. Sort yourself, please.
Rui
--

Hail Eris!

Today is Boomtime, the 38th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173

+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown

+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,

| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi

+ So let's do it...?