Bob Beck wrote:

quoted text
>> As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping

>> around such an archaic method of installation it now uses.

> I await your diffs! Please feel free to write one that works, and

quoted text
> fits on the install media for 10 architectures.

I assume you're only encouraging this because it's likely impossible.

Frankly, I find the FreeBSD installer somewhat confusing.  About the

only thing that would maybe make the OpenBSD installer simpler for new

(or impatient) users would be a "default" disk layout with sane

partition sizes for /, /tmp, /var, /usr, etc.  Of course I rarely

install OpenBSD on non-x86 boxes but I'm sure sane defaults for x86 are

quite different than mac68k or hppa.
(In my defense, i do have a Sparc Classic and several mac68ks here.

Great machines for SETI@home.)