> I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
I don't think it's worth putting my efforts into. The current
installer is about the easiest thing I have to deal with from AIX, 4
linux distributions, and FreeBSD.> As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping around such an archaic method of installation it now uses.
I await your diffs! Please feel free to write one that works, and
fits on the install media for 10 architectures.
>
I 100% Agree with you. so after 10 years of use, you should become one
of those volunteers and write such a thing.
>
Personally I find driving an ncurses based install much more tedious
playing than chucking a site_install script in site42.tgz, booting off
the net and installing, as I've used the freebsd and SLS and ubunty
and solaris and aix and blah blah blah installers. All the rest of them
require more of my time in front of the keyboard.
However I'm sure with your fabulous ideas your ncurses based installer
for openbsd will stop that trend and be much better - since you'll be working
on something that's useful to you and you are passionate about.
>
Thank you for volunteering. I await your code.
-Bob
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Rob Landley | What still uses the block layer? |
git: | |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
