On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > "Free as in Freedom!"  (but "Free as in no monetary charge" beats

quoted text
> > the hell out of taking a stand)

>

> Again, Richard Stallman's famous speech makes it clear monetary charge

> is not the reason for the free software movement.

At least at one time (and maybe still today), his goal was to destroy

programmer's livelihoods.
I have the printed, comb-binded, March 1987 Sixth Edition, version 18 of

the GNU Emacs Manual. It includes the 1985/1986 version of the GNU

Manifesto which says on page 244:
    If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative

    programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they

    restrict the use of these programs.
The use of GPL itself is known to be restrictive to many. There are many

documented examples of this.
(Should programmers using GPL be "punished"?? :)
Is there any legitimate example of OpenBSD's preferred license being

restrictive to anyone? (I really am curious about this.)