On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:

quoted text
> > "Free as in Freedom!"  (but "Free as in no monetary charge" beats
> > the hell out of taking a stand)
> 
> Again, Richard Stallman's famous speech makes it clear monetary charge
> is not the reason for the free software movement.

At least at one time (and maybe still today), his goal was to destroy 
programmer's livelihoods.

I have the printed, comb-binded, March 1987 Sixth Edition, version 18 of 
the GNU Emacs Manual. It includes the 1985/1986 version of the GNU 
Manifesto which says on page 244:

    If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
    programs, by the same token they deserve to be punished if they
    restrict the use of these programs.

The use of GPL itself is known to be restrictive to many. There are many 
documented examples of this.

(Should programmers using GPL be "punished"?? :)

Is there any legitimate example of OpenBSD's preferred license being 
restrictive to anyone? (I really am curious about this.)