On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:07:38PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:

quoted text
> On Wednesday 12 September 2007 22:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:

>

> > Reyk can take them to court over this, but he must do it before the

> > year 2047.

>

> Except he took most of it from Sam Leffler who said it is OK to license under

> the GPL. So while it's good to see you defending your code, it was not

> entirely yours to start with.

>

> Thus you see all the "horrible" GPL community "rip" you off.

> 

You are so wrong that it is not even funny anymore. Reyk's OpenHAL code was

completely reverse engeneered because Sam Leffler's HAL code was closed

source. So how can it be based on his code if it is not available?
--

:wq Claudio