> 2) Like, duh, I understand perfectly well what his point is: to slander
out in the slashdot crowd, there is a trend to say anything neccessary
to get what they want, including explaining away actual law and
ethics.
how do they get to the point of saying such things?
it is a gimme gimme gimme culture.
the letters written in the GPL and the BSD and the laws that underpin
those licenses mean nothing in the face of gimme gimme gimme. if the
GPL had words which would take away from them, they would attempt to
explain those words away.
noone is slandering those users. they're calling them what they
are -- greedy and self-serving and wrong.
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Andy Whitcroft | clam |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Lovich, Vitali | RE: [PATCH] Packet socket: mmapped IO: PACKET_TX_RING |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
