Juan Miscaro  writes:
> morning.  Indeed, I see that servers which had been whitelisted by

quoted text
> spamd were no longer so.  I verified that spamlogd is still running.

> Does anyone have any ideas how this could have happened?

Whitelist entries do expire after a while (a little more than a month

by default, if I remember correctly, but it's a tuneable).  That's a

likely explanation, unless of course those servers have been sending

you mail at shorter intervals.
For known good (or important, infrequent, impatient, or a few other

varieties we'll skip here for brevity) senders it pays to whitelist by

hand using either spamdb or by setting up a way around spamdb such as

having a no rdr rule for members of your  table.
--

Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team

http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/

"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"

delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.