> On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:55:34PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:

quoted text
> > > The license is not an alternative. The alternative is between two licenses.

> > >

> > > The moment one chooses one them... it's that one henceforth.

> >

> > And... you are a judge?

>

> Theo, be as unreasonable as you want.

I am not being unreasonable. You are not a judge, so stop acting like

you are one.  You don't know the full story.  I do not know the full

story either.  But you are being a real prick on the lists here acting

as if you have everything all figured out, you, the judge.
> The copyright notice tells the user he can choose between two licenses.

quoted text
> If you choose the GNU GPL vs, you can't later on change to BSD or

> proprietary for that would be a copyright violation.

>

> 	*Copyright notice != license*

I am glad you are so sure, so confident.  Are you placing money on the

outcome?  Many many other people are NOT SO SURE AT ALL.
So leave it, ok?