On 01/09/07, Martin Schrvder  wrote:

quoted text
> 2007/9/2, Constantine A. Murenin :

> > If you want your modifications to be licensed differently, then you

> > would have to put a new licence on top of existing licensing text, as

> > far I as understand. This is how it's often done in OpenBSD and

> > NetBSD, IIRC.

>

> This has to agreed by all copyright holders.

You are mistaken, it has not -- as long as the licences are compatible

and the names of the copyright holders appear aligned to their correct

licence.
However, with this Atheros HAL case this is not the solution -- if the

Linux people wrap GPL around BSD code, then we won't be able to get

any changes back.
C.