Re: More on the Atheros driver situation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Saturday, September 1, 2007 - 2:33 pm

On 9/1/07, Steven wrote:

Someone other than the authors _cannot_ change the license. Neither of
these licenses grants anyone rights to change or remove licenses of
the distributed code. In fact, they explicitly state that the license
(and copyright) must stay intact. (New material can have a new license
clause appended to it, but that is completely different than what
you're talking about.)

This whole escapade would be a lot simpler if people would stop
relying on guesswork and assumptions for matters they do not
understand. For most matters like these in the real world, the
preferred behavior is to clam up until you study and understand it,
and then engage in commentary.

Read Theo's earlier email on the matter. He explains it quite well.

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118861134304239&w=2

DS

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
More on the Atheros driver situation, Theo de Raadt, (Sat Sep 1, 12:37 pm)
Re: More on the Atheros driver situation, J.C. Roberts, (Sun Sep 2, 1:43 am)
Re: More on the Atheros driver situation, Steven, (Sat Sep 1, 1:12 pm)
Re: More on the Atheros driver situation, Darren Spruell, (Sat Sep 1, 2:33 pm)