On 01/09/07, David H. Lynch Jr. <dhlii@comcast.net> wrote:That is entirely false. If the file has a copyright on it, unless it is otherwise noticed, you cannot simply do whatever you wish with the file. The moment you remove the licence is the moment you make the code nonfree (e.g. non-compatible with any free or open-source licence). If instead of removing the licence you put your own licence under a copyright statement of someone else, well, that simply constitutes fraud -- it's no different than quietly changing the first page of a legal document after the document is already signed and approved. C.
| Tejun Heo | [PATCH 2/5] sysfs: simplify sysfs_rename_dir() |
| Xavier Bestel | Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic ... |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! |
| Vu Pham | Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Lea Wiemann | Re: [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: use new Git::Repo API, and add optional caching |
| Miklos Vajna | Re: [PATCH] git-daemon: fix for rotating logs |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [PATCH] better git-submodule status output |
| thacrazze | Multiboot Windows XP + OpenBSD doesnt work |
| askthelist | Packets Per Second Limit? |
| chefren | Re: Multi-Threaded SSH/SCP made by university of Puttsburgh |
| Craig Skinner | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Stephen Pierce | SLS |
| drew | Re: Linux-0.12 |
