On 8/28/07, Darrin Chandler  wrote:

quoted text
> Normally I wouldn't repeat undeadly stuff here on misc@, but I'm sure

> many of you will want to know.

>

> http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20070829001634

>

>

> And if you do this kind of thing, it's worth letting the rest of the

> world in on this:

> http://digg.com/linux_unix/Lnux_Driver_Violated_BSD_License

I am currently having a discussion about dual licensing, and am a bit

confused. Is Reyk and others working on this drivers code dual

licensed (from the diff it doesn't seem like it is, since I see a BSD

3 Clause)? Also say I submit a patch for this driver, does that mean

this will have to be dual licensed also or can I choose if it is BSD 3

Clause or GPLv2?