| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Kareem Dana | sendmail reject and access_db question
Our domain gets e-mails from Company A, but as the log below shows
they are rejected because the Message-ID field is invalid:
Aug 28 14:21:44 grimace sm-mta[15540]: STARTTLS=server,
relay=host234.companya.com [65.218.114.XXX], version=TLSv1/SSLv3,
verify=FAIL, cipher=EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA, bits=168/168
Aug 28 14:21:44 mail sm-mta[15540]: l7SJLhXB015540:
ruleset=CheckMessageId, arg1=<9b8e85b6-da30-4786-9d24-217d43a0ddf2>,
relay=host234.companya.com [65.218.114.XXX], reject=553 5.0.0 Header
Err...
| Aug 28, 6:55 pm 2007 |
| Andreas Bihlmaier | sendmail WANT_SMTPAUTH=yes broken in -current
Hello misc@,
today my long-working automatic installer broke because sendmail doesn't
compile, or to be more exact install with WANT_SMTPAUTH anymore.
How to reproduce?
pkg_info | grep -i sasl
cyrus-sasl-2.1.22p1 <snip>
echo "pwcheck_method: saslauthd" > /usr/local/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf \
|| return 1
echo "pwcheck_method: saslauthd" > /usr/local/lib/sasl2/Cyrus.conf \
|| return 1
chmod 444 /usr/local/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf \
/usr/local/lib/sasl2/Cyrus.conf || ret...
| Aug 28, 5:24 pm 2007 |
| Paolo Supino | Re: trying to compile frickin pptp proxy
Hi
Thank you!!!
I had the feeling that the problem is in the Makefile.OpenBSD, but
didn't know how to fix it. Doing what you suggested below solved the
problem and I'm now able to build frickin proxy.
Now I have to make it work ...
TIA
Paolo
| Aug 28, 5:02 pm 2007 |
| c l | Re: openbsd instead of cisco vpn client
I've successfully built a site to site vpn between openbsd and cisco gear,
both the 3000 series concentrators and asa 5520's.
This might help.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=117242498422792&w=2
This details my setup that finally worked.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=117245629704699&w=2
Otherwise the vpnc client in ports works fine to connect one openbsd box to a
cisco vpn.
Good luck.
_________________________________________________________________
Connect to t...
| Aug 28, 5:00 pm 2007 |
| Vim Visual | lenovo x61s bsd.mp Obsd 4.2 difficulties et al.
Hi,
I am having a couple of issues with obsd on the lenovo x61s...
especially the lackage of wireless support, but the driver (Intel
4965AGN) should be ready in 1-2 weeks.
I'd like to ask you whether you see some obvious error.
I installed -current from a snapshot:
uname -a
OpenBSD arktomis.bautzi.de 4.2 GENERIC#374 i386
0) The worst problem is when I boot with bsd.mp... the boot process
freezes and the last lines I get are as shown in this picture:
www.aei.mpg.de/~pau/BSDMP.jpg
dme...
| Aug 28, 4:48 pm 2007 |
| Jason George | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
We have Kettenis. As long as I keep tossing him edge cases of breakage on
Ultrasparc machines and he digs into finding out what's going on, we keep
making progress.
All in due time, but the magic doesn't happen overnight.
| Aug 28, 3:59 pm 2007 |
| Vim Visual | Re: OpenBSD Berlin?
Last message regarding OpenBSD Berlin
Gabriel set up a mailing list. if you are interested, join it:
Mailing list for OpenBSD in Berlin :
=============================
--> http://www.abc.se/mailman/listinfo/openbsd-berlin <--
Cheers,
Pau
PS: Gabriel, did you get my emails re last meeting?
| Aug 28, 3:57 pm 2007 |
| Rolf Sommerhalder | dmesg amd64-current on Sun Fire X4600 M2
Thanks for all posts with dmesgs from Sun Fire X2100 / X4100 / X4200
(although most without M2 suffix). They helped us in our purchasing
decision of several such servers with M2 suffix.
Please find below the dmesg of amd64.mp-current (snapshot 23-Aug-2007)
on a Sun Fire X4600 M2 which is equipped with four dual-core Opteron
8220 CPU, 32 GB of RAM and four built-in NICs.
Currently, Sun has a special where you get three X4600 M2s for the
price of two. We purchased such a "multipack" to run a large,...
| Aug 28, 1:40 pm 2007 |
| Daniel Ouellet | Re: dmesg amd64-current on Sun Fire X4600 M2
Sadly, the only problem is that you will not be able to use that much
memory here.
| Aug 28, 1:56 pm 2007 |
| Paolo Supino | trying to compile frickin pptp proxy
Hi
I'm trying to compile frickin pptp proxy on an OpenBSD 4.1 system.
The compilation fails with the following errors:
g++ -Wall -g -O2 -I/home/paolo/src/frickin/include
-L/home/paolo/src/frickin/lib -o frickin2 main.o logger.o
configuration.o session.o listener.o entity.o server.o client.o call.o
rfc2637.o grehandler.o exception.o nat.o util.o -pthread -lconfig++
g++: main.o: No such file or directory
g++: logger.o: No such file or directory
g++: configuration.o: No such file or directory
...
| Aug 28, 1:03 pm 2007 |
| Marmotic Marvel | Re: trying to compile frickin pptp proxy
Maybe they're being created in [somewhere]/obj. Look there; try
deleting [somewhere]/obj and recompile.
Something is probably goofy in the Makefile. Something is all
"fricked" up with "frickin" beyond the developer's subadolescent
vocabulary choices. (The word is mildly offensive in English.)
Try "find /home/paolo/src/frickin | grep grehandler.o" to find where
those .o's are "frickin" going.
Maybe the developer intended to use "frickin" gmake.
Dave
--
"America ... might bec...
| Aug 28, 2:32 pm 2007 |
| Lars Noodén | Re: trying to compile frickin pptp proxy
You may want to reconsider the experiment with PPTP. It's very
difficult to deal with and there appear to be serious problems with the
protocol itself, even in later versions:
http://www.schneier.com/pptp-faq.html
IPsec and SSL are your two serious options:
http://www.vpnc.org/vpn-standards.html
-Lars
| Aug 28, 1:33 pm 2007 |
| Paolo Supino | Re: trying to compile frickin pptp proxy
Hi Lars
I know about the limitation and their implications, but unfortunately
I don't control the other peer and have to live with what I'm given.
TIA
Paolo
| Aug 28, 1:44 pm 2007 |
| Pieter Verberne | Umass0 Phase Error, residue=0
Hi,
I'm trying to backup my music collection on a msdos/fat formatted
external harddrive. After copying some files, the process 'hangs'.
I'm copying with xfe (gui-file manager) but cp does the same. I'm
not sure when the error exactly occurs. It might be when a
specific file is being operating on but I'm absolutly not sure.
$ sudo disklabel /dev/sd0c
disklabel: warning, DOS partition table with no valid OpenBSD partition
# /dev/sd0c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: 1600BEVExternal
flag...
| Aug 28, 11:00 am 2007 |
| frantisek holop | Re: Umass0 Phase Error, residue=0
i have met Mr residue a couple of times as well.
i think i even asked about it on the list.
also with disks/devices that contain msdos partitions.
i think once it was clearly when i moved my external disk,
and perhaps the cable moved in a wrong way, i catalogued
it as a hw issue. a couple of times it happened when
i finished copying stuff to my iriver t10 and tried
to unmount it. but the files were there...
i only write this so that we have something in the archives
about it. sorry i can...
| Aug 28, 11:24 am 2007 |
| Terry | OT Strange Punishment
I found this article interesting.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6204348.html
--
Terry
http://tyson.homeunix.org
http://www.UnixByte.com
| Aug 28, 9:15 am 2007 |
| Jack J. Woehr | Re: OT Strange Punishment
It just shows how these laws are designed to protect Microsoft
at the expense of everyone else. Microsoft has been very
effective over the past decades at lobbying congress to "enclose
the commons" of computer science.
There is a bill before Congress now to roll back patent protection,
notably in the field of software. American users of OpenBSD might
want to follow this struggle, which is running into massive opposition
from non-comp-sci patent holders.
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Developm...
| Aug 28, 11:32 am 2007 |
| Daniel A. Ramaley | Re: OT Strange Punishment
Software patents were just a bad idea to begin with. Patenting numbers
and algorithms is ridiculous.
I wish i had a patent on determining the total number of objects in a
set when the numbers of objects in all mutually exclusive subsets of
the set are known [my lame attempt to translate "addition" into
patent-speak]. Imagine how much money i could make if i controlled such
a basic operation! Oh wait, civilization as we know it would never have
been able to develop and instead of working a "...
| Aug 28, 2:54 pm 2007 |
| Die Gestalt | Re: OT Strange Punishment
Why doesn't he run the monitoring software in a virtual machine?
| Aug 28, 9:35 am 2007 |
| Lars Hansson | Re: OT Strange Punishment
Because it would violate his parole? Who cares anyway?
If you can't do the time don't do the crime.
---
Lars Hansson
| Aug 28, 9:44 am 2007 |
| Dave Anderson | Re: OT Strange Punishment
We should all care, because there's actually an important question
buried in this: to what extent is it acceptable for 'the government' to
demand that someone make substantial or expensive changes in their life
merely for its convenience?
Note that he isn't complaining about being required to run monitoring
software, just about being required to run Windows rather than his
accustomed OS (presumably because Windows is the only OS that the
government's preferred monitoring software will run on).
...
| Aug 28, 11:19 am 2007 |
| Gilles Chehade | Re: OT Strange Punishment
It is acceptable to the extent that the guy did something illegal, is
being punished for it and should consider himself happy that he is
allowed to use a computer still.
If he were using his ubuntu in a constructive way, he would not be
forced to run Windows today. Tough luck.
--
sysadmin & coder @ http://www.evilkittens.org/
coder @ http://www.exalead.com/
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
| Aug 28, 5:37 am 2007 |
| Dave Anderson | Re: OT Strange Punishment
But, as I understand the issue, this is _not_ part of his specified
punishment -- it's just a side-effect of the manner in which the
government wants to impose a portion of his punishment. There appears
to be no real reason for it other than the government's convenience.
You appear to be arguing that someone convicted of a crime should lose
rights under the law beyond those which the law specifies as being taken
away. Is this a correct inference?
Whether or not you hold that opinion, I certai...
| Aug 28, 12:49 pm 2007 |
| Emilio Perea | Re: OT Strange Punishment
As I understand the issue, he agreed to have the goverment monitor all
his computer activity. This requires that he run an operating system
that will allow that. Does Ubuntu? I guess it's possible, and in that
case it would be reasonable to request that the goverment monitor his
current OS. Otherwise he needs to change OS or go back to jail. Wasn't
that what he agreed to?
I'm sorry to say that I suspect him to have known all the time that his
parole officer would not be able to monitor his c...
| Aug 28, 2:30 pm 2007 |
| Dave Anderson | Re: OT Strange Punishment
You may be right; all the information I have is what's shown up in this
thread, and I've no idea whether anyone has implemented suitable
monitoring software for Linux (or exactly how the 'monitoring'
requirement was arrived at).
But this incident does raise the question of what sort of presumably
unintended costs 'the government' should be allowed to impose on
_anyone_ at its whim -- and _that_ issue is one which should interest
all of us (lest we find ourselves at its sharp end).
Dave
-- ...
| Aug 28, 2:55 pm 2007 |
| Die Gestalt | Re: OT Strange Punishment
I think they simply have the monitoring software for Windows and not
for Linux because it has not been bought/developed/whatever.
Linux is not the point, it would be the same if he were using hardware
that prevents the monitoring (such as a firewall).
While I sympathize with what the fellow is running through, I find it
a bit out of place that he complains about not being allowed to use
Linux when he could be sitting in a cell.
Basically the deal is "It's ok you use a computer in a way we can
...
| Aug 28, 3:58 pm 2007 |
| Die Gestalt | Re: OT Strange Punishment
Good point.
| Aug 28, 10:00 am 2007 |
| reje | Re: Scaling DNS with CARP + pf (+ hoststated ?)
In the sense of expanding DNS infrastructure, your
comments seem sane enough (you definitely read that
DNS & BIND book :-)
On the other side, I really need to introduce
_additional_ availability of DNS servers/resolvers.
This is especially true for resolvers as they are the
first layer users are facing. Assume the situation
when ordinary Windows user tries to access a web page
not yet cached in his box local DNS cache. From my
experience, it's needed up to 15 seconds for Windows
box to conta...
| Aug 28, 4:12 am 2007 |
| Tom Bombadil | syskonnect SK-9E22
Greetings all...
We bought a SK-9S22 (pci-x) card a while ago, and even though 'man msk'
listed it as working on 4.0, it actually didn't work.
So, now we are thinking about a SK-9E22 (pci-e) for another box, and we
think we should ask if this model is working on 4.1 before actually
spending any money on it.
Also, if anybody can recommend any 4-port gigabit NIC for openbsd, we
would appreciate it
Thanks in advance,
g.
| Aug 27, 11:22 pm 2007 |
| Craig Skinner - Sun ... | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
Yay! Action at last.
--
========================================================
Craig Skinner craig.skinner@sun.co.uk
Phone +44 (0) 1506 673024 5-digit shortdial:x73024
Sun Remote Support Centre, Linlithgow, Scotland, UK
========================================================
| Aug 28, 5:59 am 2007 |
| Edd Barrett | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
Hi,
Wow! This is great news.
What I would really like to see is SMP for sparc64. Hopefully this has
become easier now.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---------------------------------------------------
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
| Aug 28, 11:08 am 2007 |
| J.C. Roberts | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
The major requirement for SMP on sparc64 is for some extremely talented
people having both significant interest and copious amounts of free
time.
After spending years, if not decades, being yanked around by Sun on
requests for proper docs and errata, you can understand why interest in
such work isn't very enthusiastic... -about as much of a understatement
as saying "a supernova tends to brighten things up." ;-)
jcr
| Aug 28, 2:37 pm 2007 |
| Darrin Chandler | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
Better late than never, but damn is it late.
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
| Aug 28, 12:14 pm 2007 |
| Theo de Raadt | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
Indeed, that is the correct sentiment regarding Sun's action here.
The facts of the industry are simply this: Approximately 95% of
machine parts are documented (whether they are documented well or not
is a totally seperate question).
Starting roughly around 1990, Sun put themselves on the path of
supplying only the absolute minimum documentation for their machine
parts. Meanwhile, the PC really took off, and all the documentation
for PC parts has always been out there (minus a few special case...
| Aug 28, 12:43 pm 2007 |
| Karl Sjödahl - dunceor | Re: FOSS Open Hardware Documentation
This is really nice and maybe we can expect better hardware support on
SPARCs. This is probobly also good since I hope this puts pressure on
other hardware manufacturers to open up their documentation. Maybe
dlg@ can shed some more light on what is comming out of this from a
OpenBSD perspective?
BR
dunceor
| Aug 28, 1:22 am 2007 |
| Mike Erdely | Re: maybe OT 3 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death
We'll hoist a few in his honor at the CapBUG meeting tonight. If you're
in the MD/DC area and can join us, please do.
http://capbug.org/
-ME
| Aug 28, 2:01 pm 2007 |
| J.C. Roberts | Re: maybe OT 3 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death
Thanks Diana! Chuck is a superstar. To this day I can think of no one
who as made me laugh more while at the same time teaching me important
technical details.
There are countless great Chuck stories, from Chuck telling his
conservative Wall Street boss who complained about his regular work
attire, "shirt, shoes, sober -pick two," to all the hilarious jokes he
sent freely as private emails to others in need of help.
Chuck always remembered to keep things fun, even the things which he
alr...
| Aug 28, 11:36 am 2007 |
| Johan SANCHEZ | Re: maybe OT 3 year anniversay of Chuck Yerkes death
Nice thing , but i don t think one can forget him, his advices or
his jokes.
Personally i still have his posts in my mailbox.
Thanks again
| Aug 28, 2:42 am 2007 |
| Samuel Moñux | Re: openbsd instead of cisco vpn client
You can't with base install since it doesn't support xauth(it's in
isakmpd's todo I think), but vpnc works good enough for my needs,
which look similar to yours. I need to reset the connection nightly
because unreliable ike rekeying, but, other than that, It's stable.
http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/
Best regards,
Samuel
| Aug 28, 5:47 am 2007 |
| Craig Skinner - Sun ... | Re: openssl: digital envelope routines:EVP_DecryptFinal:bad ...
Solved, was revenge of the wonkey donkey sysadmin (me).
Nothing to do with decryption.
As I was getting nowhere with /home, I had a go with other slices, such
as /var/mail. Decrypted fine using the same commands as before, but
bitched about inodes not found on the tape on restore.
I finally figured out what I'd done wrong:
As the 4.0 box ran out of space, I added another small drive as tmp.
I had my script dump to that, then when done, move the dump to /var,
thus over-writing last wee...
| Aug 28, 10:25 am 2007 |
| Damien Miller | Re: Software freedom
Why are you making excuses for the people who provide binary blobs? It
doesn't matter at all what the owner's _intent_ is, when the practical
consequence is that OS developers have to put in layers of hacks for
bugs that they cannot themselves fix.
-d
| Aug 28, 1:12 am 2007 |
| Die Gestalt | Re: Software freedom
For me it's a consistency problem. It's like selling a sport car with
4x4 tires.
First of all, if you opt for an open source system it may be because
you are concerned by the aforementioned problem, otherwise you would
go for Windows or another proprietary OS.
In second comes the issue of having different engineering "procedures"
inside your system, and that's never a good thing. "Hey, I think ADA
rocks, why not write some parts of the kernel in ADA?" It doesn't mean
that the procedures should n...
| Aug 28, 4:26 am 2007 |
| Marmotic Marvel | Re: Backport drivers from 4.1 to 4.0
I've been watching this thread, perhaps my comments are worth
something, or are amusing. Executive summary: track -current.
Make releases in step with OpenBSD.
That sentence contains its own solution: do not maintain old versions.
How would one maintain old versions if the underlying OS is frozen?
How do you answer customers who ask why they can't run the up-to-date
version of OpenBSD? If your salesman contacted me, saying I had
to *downgrade* my OS to Open 3.3 to run your product, I would ad...
| Aug 28, 12:28 pm 2007 |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: Radeon X1300 mobile + WXGA - out of luck?
Sorry for the slow response - yesterday was a *very* busy day.
The following configuration works, albeit at the wrong resolution:
http://jschipper.dynalias.net/~joachim/posts/20070828/Xorg.conf
It also contains some failed attempts that might be interesting
(ModeLine ...; Virtual 1200 800 and Option "ShadowFB" "no").
Joachim
--
TFMotD: txp (4) - 3Com 3XP Typhoon/Sidewinder (3CR990) 10/100 Ethernet
device
| Aug 28, 12:20 pm 2007 |
| Stuart Henderson | Re: to zaurus or not to zaurus
Battery life is not too good, but can be extended quite easily at
the expense of extra space - same voltage, connector (incl polarity)
as Sony PSP so there are plenty of battery packs, solar chargers
etc that will work.
Given the obvious general limitations (not much ram, not much disk),
the things I most dislike are: always running from the internal
battery (if you flatten it you can't just plug in another source
and go, you need to let it recharge a bit first), and the limited
precision of the...
| Aug 28, 5:41 am 2007 |
| Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez | Re: OpenBSd or HP-UX?
How was your adventure?? Can you be more specific?? I know the cost
part...obviously it is more cheaper run OpenBSD that HP-UX. But i need
more...something really heavy like "I tried to install an OpenLDAP with
HP-UX and the system load with 2000 users rise to the sky...but the same
number of users with OpenBSD had an incredible performance and never
Thanks to you...
Alvaro
| Aug 27, 9:07 pm 2007 |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: OpenBSd or HP-UX?
I wrote a huge mail, but essentially: `what Jacob said'.
I think that if you manage to convince the right people that a network
of smaller nodes has advantages (higher availability, better
scalability, lower `TCO' - whatever), OpenBSD - with low cost, good and
cheap support, and very competitive performance - becomes a very
attractive option.
On the other hand, if you really need a 16-core machine with 32 GB of
memory, installing OpenBSD gets you cool dmesg pr0n but not a really
useful configu...
| Aug 28, 3:17 pm 2007 |
| Marc Balmer | Re: OpenBSd or HP-UX?
OpenBSD can not authenticat against an LDAP server. Well, stricly
speaking it can, but you have duplicate all accounts on OpenBSD. So
realistically it can't.
| Aug 28, 3:45 pm 2007 |
| Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez | Re: OpenBSd or HP-UX?
And this is, i think, the main point for my boss and his "not
understanding" about the advantages of OpenBSD over HP-UX. But...i have
hope yet...he does not "close the door" to the OpenBSD possibility. He
wants probes...only i need to find a heavy argument. For example...the
developers that port OpenBSD to HPPA and HP300 platforms....maybe they
have benchmarks between this machines running HP-UX and/or OpenBSD. It
This is a good point too. Is it the performance of OpenBSD running on
Sun co...
| Aug 27, 8:59 pm 2007 |
| J.C. Roberts | Re: OpenBSd or HP-UX?
The hppa port is for 32bit. The hppa64 port will run more modern 64bit
parisc systems. With the correct hardware both hppa and hppa64 are
usable but you need to realize two things: (1) the ports are still
under development and (2) benchmarks lie.
The *ONLY* "benchmarks" that are applicable to your decisions are from
the tests that *YOU* run in *YOUR* environment.
Your boss should read up on LDAP and realize it was designed to scale by
supporting clustering, fail-over and fault tolerance......
| Aug 27, 10:39 pm 2007 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| August 27, 2007 | August 28, 2007 | August 29, 2007 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Greg KH | [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging) |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Steven Rostedt | [RFC PATCH 1/3] Unified trace buffer |
git: | |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Marco Costalba | [ANNOUNCE] qgit4 aka qgit ported to Windows |
| Andi Kleen | Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Damian Gerow | Oddly high load average |
| Benjamin Adams | BSD Port from OpenJDK |
| Michael Grollman | Re: 8169 Intermittent ifup Failure Issue With RTL8102E Chipset in Intel's New D945... |
| Volker Armin Hemmann | build error with 2.6.27.6+reiser4+ehci-hub patch. ERROR: "mii_ethtool_gset" [drive... |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | [resend take 2 0/4] Distributed storage. |
| Wenji Wu | A Linux TCP SACK Question |
