Re: nat ipv6 -> ipv4 using pf

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Monday, August 27, 2007 - 10:36 am

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 01:32:20PM +0100, Brian Candler wrote:

hmm yes, the ipv6 address wont fit in the ipv4 space, the other way
around would work but it will become a mess (apache log files for
example). so that's a no go. the l7 proxy could work, i have polipo
working but not for the outside world. i don't like compiling apache
with ipv6 support since i would end up with a non standard openbsd base
install (which will complicate upgrading and troubleshooting).

the faithd daemon als looks quit cool, although it maps the other way
around, it will be usefull when you have an ipv6 only network.

anyway, thanks for the good suggestions, i will have a look at apache2
(since i'm running svn too, this might be a good idea), or else i will
simply drop ipv6 for the http and wait for the ipv6 patches to be
included.

alwin.

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, alwin, (Sun Aug 26, 6:48 am)
Re: nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, Olivier Mehani, (Mon Aug 27, 8:53 am)
Re: nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, Brian Candler, (Mon Aug 27, 8:32 am)
Re: nat ipv6 -> ipv4 using pf, alwin, (Mon Aug 27, 10:36 am)
Re: nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, Brian Candler, (Mon Aug 27, 3:29 pm)
Support for soundblaster audigy SE ?, Nicolas Letellier, (Mon Aug 27, 10:53 am)
Re: Support for soundblaster audigy SE ?, Alexandre Ratchov, (Mon Aug 27, 12:51 pm)
Re: nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, Jeroen Massar, (Sun Aug 26, 7:02 am)
Re: nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, Lars Noodén, (Sun Aug 26, 8:13 am)
Re: nat ipv6 -&gt; ipv4 using pf, Jeroen Massar, (Sun Aug 26, 8:21 am)