On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
quoted text > Hi,
>
> in my network, I have five OSPF routers and hosts which learn their routes via
> OSPF, all in one area. One of the routers is a Cisco, all other affected
> routers and hosts are OpenBSD/i386 4.1-stable as of May 24th. The problem is
> that some machines establish an adjacency with some, but not all machines in
> that area.
>
>
> On 192.168.50.4:
>
> $ ospfctl show nei
> ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime
> 10.0.0.2 5 FULL/OTHER 00:00:37 192.168.50.2 fxp0 00:19:04
> 10.0.0.5 50 FULL/OTHER 00:00:37 192.168.50.5 fxp0 01w5d17h
> 10.0.0.6 50 FULL/DR 00:00:33 192.168.50.6 fxp0 01w5d17h
> 10.0.0.3 5 FULL/OTHER 00:00:34 192.168.50.3 fxp0 02w2d12h
> 10.0.0.1 10 FULL/OTHER 00:00:34 192.168.50.1 fxp0 01w6d21h
>
>
> On 192.168.50.3:
>
> $ ospfctl show nei
> ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime
> 10.0.0.2 5 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:31 192.168.50.2 fxp1 -
> 10.0.0.5 50 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:31 192.168.50.5 fxp1 -
> 10.0.0.6 50 FULL/DR 00:00:38 192.168.50.6 fxp1 01w5d17h
> 10.0.0.1 10 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:39 192.168.50.1 fxp1 -
> 10.0.0.4 50 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:39 192.168.50.4 fxp1 02w2d12h
>
>
> On 192.168.50.2:
>
> $ ospfctl show nei
> ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime
> 10.0.0.5 50 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:32 192.168.50.5 dc2 -
> 10.0.0.1 10 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:30 192.168.50.1 dc2 -
> 10.0.0.4 50 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:39 192.168.50.4 dc2 00:19:04
> 10.0.0.3 5 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:39 192.168.50.3 dc2 -
> 10.0.0.6 50 FULL/DR 00:00:38 192.168.50.6 dc2 00:19:04
>
>
> The router 192.168.50.1 is the Cisco machine.
>
> Restarting the ospfd on one or the other machine has no effect I could
> determine so far.
>
>
> Any ideas are most welcome!
>
This is perfectly fine. Only the DR and BDR routers 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.4
will have full connections with all other routers. All others (state
OTHER) will remain in 2-WAY (as in we have to way communication but we do
not send each other messages).
--
:wq Claudio
