login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Publishing your spamtraps list, is that a wise move?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@...>
Cc: Peter N. M. Hansteen <peter@...>, <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, July 5, 2007 - 11:58 am

If you have a good whitelist this won't bother you.

Why make it obvious that the addresses are spamtrap ones?
Just hide a comment somewhere on the homepage that only harvesters will see
but
not people who browse your web site ( unless they read the html source ).

I have been hit where a spammer has used one of our addresses as a reply_to
address.
No worries. spamd doesn't even break a sweat. The mail doesn't ever hit our
server
and the only servers that have the problem are the mail servers that believe
the forged reply to address
as they bang their heads trying to deliver the bounced mails. They should
try spamd :-)

g'day

Mark




On 05/07/07, Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@stilyagin.com> wrote:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Publishing your spamtraps list, is that a wise move?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Thu Jul 5, 5:07 am)
Re: Publishing your spamtraps list, is that a wise move?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Mon Jul 9, 4:30 am)
Re: Publishing your spamtraps list, is that a wise move?, Darrin Chandler, (Thu Jul 5, 11:35 am)
Re: Publishing your spamtraps list, is that a wise move?, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Thu Jul 5, 12:49 pm)
Re: Publishing your spamtraps list, is that a wise move?, mark reardon, (Thu Jul 5, 11:58 am)
speck-geostationary