On 7/23/07, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Good point.
> If you are concerned about the entries that you saw whitelisted, have
I've not had a chance to examine where the white listed hosts
were trying to send to (yet). I have yet to run sendmail to
accept incoming mail. However, while monitoring the output
from spamdb, I did noticed most "to" addresses for the GREY
trapped hosts were bogus recipients.
> Also, though spamd works GREAT, it is what it is. As I mentioned above,
I see your point about open relays and such.
Thanks for your input!
--patrick
| Dave Hansen | Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Corey Minyard | [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
