On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:25:43AM -0400, Umnada Tyrolla wrote:
Because preaching takes much less energy than sitting for long hours at a
computer and figuring out why a piece of code is refusing to work.
I myself coded some GPL software and released it, the biggest one is 25% of the
Links browser which is included in the OpenBSD packages. It's not clear to me
what's better, GPL or BSD. I don't care. Personally I always choose GPL for
software projects and GFDL for hardware projects.
Due to law, hardware is de facto always released under a BSD style licence. I
didn't have any problem with the fact that my hardware is under BSD. Neither
had I problem with my software being released under GPL.
CL<
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 1/3] firmware: allow firmware files to be built into kernel image |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
