Rico Secada wrote:
i think it gives me a massive erection. the quality of an admin is
measurable directly as a function of the extraneous certifications they
have, duh!
> Is this a good idea? From my perspective it looks like a smart marketing
if it were for non-BSD licensed OSes, i would totally agree, however i
think it's a legitimate move to give us BSD folks some sort of laurels
that appeal to stupid HR and mgmt types and not a move to hustle up cash.
> Taking a certification doesn't prove anything imho. And the way that they
knowing one BSD implies a comparable level of skill in the other ones,
IMO. only a matter of figuring out the package utility and occasionally
using features unique to that BSD. there is also that deep throbbing
philosophical pain that overwhelms me when i use the other BSDs...
cheers,
jake
> Best regards
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
