Re: semi transparent spamd-bridge

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Schneeberger <cschnee@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 - 4:22 pm

On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:44:30PM +0200, Christoph Schneeberger wrote:

I also used that article to do this setup, and it worked fine...

> case 1: src host is whitelisted, connection is allowed to 1.1.1.35,

I don't think case 2 is for the reason you point out. At least I never
had that problem.

Do you have the absolutely essential "pass ... route-to ..." rule correct?

--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
semi transparent spamd-bridge, Christoph Schneeberger, (Wed Jun 6, 3:44 pm)
Re: semi transparent spamd-bridge, Darrin Chandler, (Wed Jun 6, 4:22 pm)
Re: semi transparent spamd-bridge, Christoph Schneeberger, (Wed Jun 6, 6:11 pm)
Re: semi transparent spamd-bridge, Mark Pecaut, (Wed Jun 6, 7:23 pm)
Re: semi transparent spamd-bridge, Christoph Schneeberger, (Thu Jun 7, 5:06 am)