Lontronics Mailinglist account wrote:
when competition is involved companies develop products as quickly as
they can to keep up with the joneses. if your product(s) lack the bells
and whistles the competition has, joey bagoconsumer will not buy your
stuff b/c he's been successfully brainwashed into thinking feature X
will make his life better. for an average computer user multicore
processing doesn't do a whole lot besides compensate for slugware-driven
OSes that are built like amUrican cars, whose primary purpose is to
build product dependency and require replacement 4-5 years down the
road. same lesson henry ford learned with the model t applies to
large-scale hardware manufacturing.
you make more money if your widgets break because your new widget is
vastly improved. new packaging, same great defects!
cheers,
jake
> Though, I do have a laptop with a duo core, running OBSD without any problems.
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| Greg Smith | PostgreSQL pgbench performance regression in 2.6.23+ |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Gilles Chehade | CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src |
| Chris Kuethe | CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src |
| Owain Ainsworth | CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src |
| Miod Vallat | CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang |
| Wenji Wu | A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| Matheos Worku | 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X |
